monarchy is for cucks

Societal problems, economics, etc.

Who in their right mind would willingly swear loyalty to a king or queen? fucking lol "god save the queen".
Supporting this primitive/outdated form of government = worker bee cuck. Unless you're way at the top of the hierarchy ie. the king,
Last edited by terminate on Sun Mar 19, 2017 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.



right
monarchy is for silly people as UK,sweden,spain and some other faggy lands were the masses have a very low IQ
The world should learn from Switzerland

You guys should know that the monarchists don't really rule those countries. They are only a tourist attraction.
Once you have taken the red pill there is no way back.

another legit thread as always..
ihateallwomen wrote:You guys should know that the monarchists don't really rule those countries. They are only a tourist attraction.

I think most people are aware of that, regardless it's something that should be done away with. The tourism argument doesn't hold up very well. Take France for example, which is #1 in world tourism and has no monarchy to speak of.



Thailand has/had a king. They loved him. the new King is accepted too.
It's not a choice really, they grew up with it.

ihateallwomen wrote:You guys should know that the monarchists don't really rule those countries. They are only a tourist attraction.


they don't rule their country but yet they are treated like royalty living the easy life at the expense of the silly people
some of them took politic descisions of importance like the king of spain etc
a evolved land don't have a monarchy parasiting not even for the tourists,
a evolved country like Switzerland have a council not a president

Fabie wrote:
ihateallwomen wrote:You guys should know that the monarchists don't really rule those countries. They are only a tourist attraction.


they don't rule their country but yet they are treated like royalty living the easy life at the expense of the silly people
some of them took politic descisions of importance like the king of spain etc
a evolved land don't have a monarchy parasiting not even for the tourists,
a evolved country like Switzerland have a council not a president


I don't see an advantage from either side. Monarchy might be better imo.



LoserFanboy wrote:
Fabie wrote:
they don't rule their country but yet they are treated like royalty living the easy life at the expense of the silly people
some of them took politic descisions of importance like the king of spain etc
a evolved land don't have a monarchy parasiting not even for the tourists,
a evolved country like Switzerland have a council not a president


I don't see an advantage from either side. Monarchy might be better imo.


of course is better for the king for the queen and their family
but not for the common people which are working as slaves to support them

Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest