Fuck niggers

Anything having to do with race, including the attractiveness of races.

AMWF CMNF wrote:
mrz wrote:don't worry I'm done looking at underage porn, I'm just going to be a class 4 sadist pedo instead . . . and it is not illegal to masturbate to it.


Hello Mrz: The above photo of the beheaded toddler girl is from a video clip which I saw maybe a few years ago which showed a man holding this toddler upright whilst its still soft body flopped about. He was distraught and must have been the father. In a cruel twist of irony, images and videos like these are not illegal in many countries even though they do far more harm to viewers than any form of simple nudity of naked underage children (e.g. age 6 to 17). The reason is that we feel much less threatened by violence than by sexuality. This is because we have more self-control over our violent urges than of our sexual desires which we feel are like dangerous powderkegs ready to explode upon us. We thus feel a pathological desire to control and regulate anything remotely to do with sexuality. In the 23rd Century, they will believe that we were all mental retards. Unbelievable were it not the truth.


Yes it is obvious that underage porn is illegal because of Christian Puritanism, coupled with the profits of the prison industrial complex. As I alluded to in this thread

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1014890

The prison industrial complex zombies are actually highly Christian, as you can see by their monuments to the ten commandments in front of their court buildings;

Image

And by their religious police giving their allegiance to the Christian God

Image

The Christian taboo against sex is how they manage to create a mythos around underage porn, attribute it magical properties such as the ability to function as a voodoo doll, fabricate a mythological billion dollar industry around it that doesn't exist, attribute to it the scientifically disproved property of increasing child sex abuse rates, and claim that it is for whatever reason immoral to look at it, despite the fact that they don't care about videos of children being decapitated, nor skinned alive for that matter, even though they justify their criminalization of underage sex images by the logic that "a child had to be abused to produce that!", even though in a good deal of underage porn there is not even abuse, but they simultaneously don't care about non-sexual media where a child is tortured to death even so long as they are clothed.

Had the parasites attempted to criminalize violent gore of children who are not naked they would have failed because this is obviously protected by the first amendment (the same as underage porn though), but because of the Christian taboo against sex and the high prevalence of Christianity in the USA, they had no issues to criminalize underage nudity, though of course their logic could not be "We need to criminalize underage porn because it will make us billions of dollars and Christians will support this because they are anti-sex puritian bigots", so instead they made up a bunch of bullshit, which today we know to be false though so it no longer even works in furtherance of the criminalization of it anymore, unfortunately though their goal was never to do anything they said their goal was, so just because every single argument they gave to justify what they did has been invalidated and contradicted it doesn't mean they will undo their treasonous unconstitutional criminal ruling.

Also even abusive underage porn is typically not more fucked up than that image, the worst of it is about equivalent in terms of the response it invokes in me anyway, it is not any different from any other sort of gore other than it is sexual.



Just look at this poster. The liberals are crying that it's racist.

When I was a kid and went to pools, blacks were always the one violating the rules and causing problems. I know of blacks that peed and shit in pools.
Attachments
2016-06-27t12-12-35-6z--1280x720_nbcnews-ux-1080-600.jpg
2016-06-27t12-12-35-6z--1280x720_nbcnews-ux-1080-600.jpg (73.33 KiB) Viewed 2760 times

BBC is sexy as fuck though. like holy fuck. imagine a big strong dark black bull as a stepdaddy. imagine him molesting your small 4'8 blonde 87 pound uber pale frame. imagine his 11 inch heavenly black salami absolutely obliterating your tiny pink angelic girly innocence. imagine begging him for forgiveness every night as he violated your angelicness. imagine begging daddy to stop. :shock:
Image



AMWF CMNF wrote:
mrz wrote:
Yes it is obvious that underage porn is illegal because of Christian Puritanism, coupled with the profits of the prison industrial complex.

[ . . . . ]

The Christian taboo against sex is how they manage to create a mythos around underage porn, attribute it magical properties such as the ability to function as a voodoo doll, fabricate a mythological billion dollar industry around it that doesn't exist, attribute to it the scientifically disproved property of increasing child sex abuse rates, and claim that it is for whatever reason immoral to look at it, despite the fact that they don't care about videos of children being decapitated, nor skinned alive for that matter, even though they justify their criminalization of underage sex images by the logic that "a child had to be abused to produce that!", even though in a good deal of underage porn there is not even abuse, but they simultaneously don't care about non-sexual media where a child is tortured to death even so long as they are clothed.

)) ". . . so long as they are clothed". How sad but true (you hit the nail on the head).

[ . . . . ]

Also even abusive underage porn is typically not more f**ked up than that image, the worst of it is about equivalent in terms of the response it invokes in me anyway, it is not any different from any other sort of gore other than it is sexual.

)) Even abusive child sexual abuse is less offensive to me, such as a naked 8 year old boy down on his knees with tears streaming down his face with a man grabbing him by the hair and pushing his face into his crotch than seeing the decapitated bloody body of a corpse. Were I to have a young child of a similar age, my child would more likely be traumatised with nightmares by the decapitated corpse. And no one wants that -- although I would not want any child of mine under age 20 to see either of course.


Yep. The Government is Not our Friend. It is happy to engage in a "knee-jerk" reaction to appease an angry public by banning advertising of practically pesticide-laced tobacco yet will not outright ban it because it receives sin taxes and political campaign contributions by the cigarette brands to all major political parties. Big Gov wants to eat its cake and have it on the table, too. It claims to be taking the moral high ground whilst rolling in the gutter in the night. The only solution is a radical renewable energy environmentalist totalitarian dictatorship by expert committee of vegans (technocracy by MDs & PhDs) which would guarantee libertarian freedoms for all. The country could raise revenue by executing all those involved in oppressive institutions such as the prison industry complex, civil asset forfeiture, and hypocrites of morality (e.g. those against child labour, child sexuality, incest, and CP) -- and harvesting their bodily organs and selling them to the highest bidders overseas to raise money for the newfound country. The country could even grow mushrooms, peyote, and opium, regulate them, and sell them abroad to the highest bidders overseas to provide a clean source of medical and recreational drugs to enrich the country and also help to reduce the dangerous black markets around the World.


I don't know why you focus so much on natural drugs, that is naive tbh. Just because something is synthesized in a lab doesn't mean it is inherently bad. Opium is much more dangerous than LSD is. All drugs should be legal and regulated. Some should be more regulated than others, primarily meth and heroin, and there should be honest non-propaganda campaigns to actually educate people as to why they should be used only with extreme caution, primarily in that they are life long craving inducing for one, and for two there are better safer drugs that you can use instead of them for a similar effect profile anyway, depending on exactly why you want to use them anyway.

This actually shows how their propaganda has a detrimental effect, when they say omg cannabis is addictive! People don't realize that cannabis addictive and meth addictive are two essentially completely different things, meth addiction is life long craving inducing more similar to nicotine, cannabis addiction is more similar to caffeine in that there are ephemeral withdrawal symptoms.

Back to topic.

mrz wrote:That would almost certainly be overrepresented in the black community, meaning that the rate of murders committed by blacks would fall substantially as compared to the murders committed by whites in the event that the war on drugs came to an end, bringing the statistics closer together.

The link you posted earlier claims that whites are more likely to use drugs than blacks:

https://donate.naacp.org/pages/criminal ... fact-sheet

Drug Sentencing Disparities

About 14 million Whites and 2.6 million African Americans report using an illicit drug
5 times as many Whites are using drugs as African Americans, yet African Americans are sent to prison for drug offenses at 10 times the rate of Whites
African Americans represent 12% of the total population of drug users, but 38% of those arrested for drug offenses, and 59% of those in state prison for a drug offense.
African Americans serve virtually as much time in prison for a drug offense (58.7 months) as whites do for a violent offense (61.7 months). (Sentencing Project)

Now if drugs are the reason for violent crimes then whites should be committing more murders than blacks. But somehow drugs only increase violence among blacks.
Once you have taken the red pill there is no way back.



Fucking retards (AMFW-CNFM + MRZ) talking to each other

Get a room you two fucking retards instead of polluting this forum with your autistic ramblings

AMWF CMNF wrote:^ Hey (!) Learn to spell my name right (!) I am trying to get an "education" about drugs from The Mrz. Sometimes Google & Wikipedia are not enough. You have a problem with self-improvement?

Self-improvement with drugs? Are you fucking kidding me?

Look at MRZ, his brain turned into mush.

He's a degenerate junkie who wants to drag everybody else down with him, because misery loves company. That's what I noticed about all the drug junkies I knew in my life.

AMWF CMNF wrote:^ Hey (!) Learn to spell my name right (!) I am trying to get an "education" about drugs from The Mrz. Sometimes Google & Wikipedia are not enough. You have a problem with self-improvement?

AMWF = Asian Male White Female
CMNF = Chinese Male Nordic Female

Right?

1. Habituation increases desire for stronger doses, and there is a risk of taking a too-strong dose resulting in overdose. With natural drugs (tobacco leaves, cannabis, khat, psilocybin mushroom, peyote, opium, etc.), their potency is lower so the risk of overdose is lower. Common examples include the risk of overdose in purified caffeine or capsaicin which could lead to fatal results. Also consider the risk of alcohol poisoning in distilled spirits. In the brewed form of beer, the person is likely to become full with calories and "pass out" before becoming killed by alcohol.


That is just inaccurate though, opium is much more habituating than LSD is. LSD is about as anti-habituating as drugs get, it builds fast and massive tolerance and essentially stops getting you high at all in no time. Opium on the other hand is an opiate (obviously) and builds tolerance with withdrawals. The lowest estimated LD50 of LSD is about 120X the standard dose, 12X the maximum dose anyone would ever want to take, and this is a very conservative estimate.

Having the government legalise and regulate all recreational drugs helps to keep them pure and safe in known dosages. But the high potency desired due to habituation is always a risk in purified or synthesised drugs.


That is honestly just not supported by science, a drug being natural or synthetic has nothing to do with its habituation/addictiveness.

Addendum: The Wikipedia page on drugs harm lists many drugs in several graphs, including LSD, but none on opium. Because opium goes into the lungs like tobacco and cannabis, you could be correct about it. Still, I would take opium as a novel painkiller before trying LSD, Lol.


Sure do whatever you want to, so long as you don't want to criminalize drugs I don't care. However, your logic is not supported by science really. I can totally understand wanting to try opium and not wanting to try LSD, they are very different drugs. Opium I would compare to a strong pure indica cannabis strain (and in fact, it is the only drug which I would compare to marijuana of any form, save for the jwh-* cp* and similar drugs, that are either cannabinoids or very closely mimic them). It's mellow, and relaxing, and chill. LSD is a totally different sort of drug, it's thought altering, mind expanding, an amplifier of senses and perception, with psychedelic visualizations (though I prefer the high definition characteristics of it more so than the distortion), spiritual, profound, and potentially overwhelming.

However, people get dependent upon opium and I've heard of people having nasty withdrawals from it, whereas LSD produces no withdrawals and it is practically counter habituating, only the heaviest LSD users use it in the area of 8 times a month, and I've been one of them even, but that is really the most you could feasibly use LSD unless you microdosed it or followed other atypical dosing regimens.

Rotting Penis wrote:
AMWF CMNF wrote:^ Hey (!) Learn to spell my name right (!) I am trying to get an "education" about drugs from The Mrz. Sometimes Google & Wikipedia are not enough. You have a problem with self-improvement?

Self-improvement with drugs? Are you fucking kidding me?

Look at MRZ, his brain turned into mush.

He's a degenerate junkie who wants to drag everybody else down with him, because misery loves company. That's what I noticed about all the drug junkies I knew in my life.


Why are you so rude and hostile to me? What have I done to offend you? I've done nothing but tell you the truth, it's just the truth is counter to the doxa you accumulated from your society is all.

mrz wrote:
Rotting Penis wrote:Self-improvement with drugs? Are you fucking kidding me?

Look at MRZ, his brain turned into mush.

He's a degenerate junkie who wants to drag everybody else down with him, because misery loves company. That's what I noticed about all the drug junkies I knew in my life.


Why are you so rude and hostile to me? What have I done to offend you? I've done nothing but tell you the truth, it's just the truth is counter to the doxa you accumulated from your society is all.

Because every time I tried to be nice you took it as an ecouragement to dwelve deeper and deeper into your autistic ramblings.

But you don't even get it,

AMWF CMNF wrote:Hello Mrz: For natural drugs, tobacco leaves and opium are certainly very physiologically addictive though their concentrations are lower than in purified drugs. For LSD there has to still be a component of "psychological" addiction, right? Meaning that we desire to do it again because it makes us "feel good" and not necessarily because our body craves it. The point I made about purified or synthesised drugs was that because they are stronger than in the natural state of plants, the risk of overdose and death are greater due to their higher potency when they require stronger doses, at least for some drugs, to get the same effects. As you note, LSD is a special case because there is no physiological dependency -- though this does not preclude a psychological addiction which could still have risks.


LSD isn't really psychologically 'addictive' for the overwhelming majority of people, though there are extreme cases of people who ended up using it extremely heavily, syd barrett of Pink Floyd being an infamous case. I'm probably one of the heaviest LSD users in the world tbh, or at least I was in my late teens through my early twenties to mid twenties when things dropped off drastically anyway, it's been like a year since I tripped though 0_0 a situation that needs to be remedied lol.

Tbh I consider LSD to be the most special and amazing drug in the world and I have absolutely zero regrets about my use of it, LSD is God ^_^ (and God loves me!). Others may have different opinions on it, but it's just a breath taking spiritual amplifying drug, like you take mushrooms and you think you are in a cartoon, you take LSD and you realize you were in a cartoon before you took it ;P.

I definitely desire to use LSD again, but I have trouble to necessarily characterize this as being psychologically addicted to it, and it isn't just because it makes you feel good, if you were looking to feel good you would take MDMA or MDA (or heroin lol), LSD goes so far beyond a pleasure drug, it is a wonder drug, like it's pretty much this beatles song really;



Words are flowing out
Like endless rain into a paper cup
They slither wildly as they slip away
Across the universe

Pools of sorrow waves of joy
Are drifting through my opened mind
Possessing and caressing me

Jai Guru Deva, om
Nothing's gonna change my world
Nothing's gonna change my world
Nothing's gonna change my world
Nothing's gonna change my world

Images of broken light
Which dance before me like a million eyes
They call me on and on across the universe

Thoughts meander like a restless wind
Inside a letter box
They tumble blindly as they make their way
Across the universe

Jai Guru Deva, om
Nothing's gonna change my world
Nothing's gonna change my world
Nothing's gonna change my world
Nothing's gonna change my world

Sounds of laughter shades of earth
Are ringing through my opened ears
Inciting and inviting me

Limitless undying love
Which shines around me like a million suns
It calls me on and on across the universe

Jai Guru Deva, om
Nothing's gonna change my world
Nothing's gonna change my world
Nothing's gonna change my world
Nothing's gonna change my world

Jai Guru Deva
Jai Guru Deva
Jai Guru Deva


That song is the most accurate description of LSD I could possibly give.

and then comes the crash and then you become a human vegetable

great

Rotting Penis wrote:and then comes the crash and then you become a human vegetable

great


The vast majority of people I know who have used or use drugs, which is essentially every single person I know, has not had any noticeable/clear damage done to them by using drugs. The only drug that has consistently fucked people up is heroin, and even that is not in all cases, I know people who have used heroin, including myself, with no noticeable problems from it. I went on a little mini heroin binge for three days. It has absolutely zero impact on my life what-so-ever. By the next day it was as if I had never even used it.

I know one person who died from a heroin overdose. I know of a few people, tangentially, who have died from drug overdoses, be they benzos+alcohol, opiates, or even ketamine shockingly (shockingly considering I've sniffed like half gram lines of it and coughed out clouds of powder like smoke and not died).

Overall, the harms of drugs are vastly exaggerated. I'm not saying they are harmless by any means. I don't want to give the impression that you can just throw caution to the wind. However, if you avoid the hardest drugs like meth and heroin, if you do your research and use harm reduction, the chances of you having any problems from drugs, is very low, it is vastly exaggerated.

mrz wrote:
Rotting Penis wrote:and then comes the crash and then you become a human vegetable

great


The vast majority of people I know who have used or use drugs, which is essentially every single person I know, has not had any noticeable/clear damage done to them by using drugs. The only drug that has consistently fucked people up is heroin, and even that is not in all cases, I know people who have used heroin, including myself, with no noticeable problems from it. I went on a little mini heroin binge for three days. It has absolutely zero impact on my life what-so-ever. By the next day it was as if I had never even used it.

I know one person who died from a heroin overdose. I know of a few people, tangentially, who have died from drug overdoses, be they benzos+alcohol, opiates, or even ketamine shockingly (shockingly considering I've sniffed like half gram lines of it and coughed out clouds of powder like smoke and not died).

Overall, the harms of drugs are vastly exaggerated. I'm not saying they are harmless by any means. I don't want to give the impression that you can just throw caution to the wind. However, if you avoid the hardest drugs like meth and heroin, if you do your research and use harm reduction, the chances of you having any problems from drugs, is very low, it is vastly exaggerated.

said by a person who says he just wants to die - your neurotransmitters are fucked buddy,

obviously I can't say whether they were fucked first and then you took drugs or if drugs had any negative effect on you, but the fact is you're fucked and so you cannot vouch for the safety of narcotics with your own example

Rotting Penis wrote:
mrz wrote:
The vast majority of people I know who have used or use drugs, which is essentially every single person I know, has not had any noticeable/clear damage done to them by using drugs. The only drug that has consistently fucked people up is heroin, and even that is not in all cases, I know people who have used heroin, including myself, with no noticeable problems from it. I went on a little mini heroin binge for three days. It has absolutely zero impact on my life what-so-ever. By the next day it was as if I had never even used it.

I know one person who died from a heroin overdose. I know of a few people, tangentially, who have died from drug overdoses, be they benzos+alcohol, opiates, or even ketamine shockingly (shockingly considering I've sniffed like half gram lines of it and coughed out clouds of powder like smoke and not died).

Overall, the harms of drugs are vastly exaggerated. I'm not saying they are harmless by any means. I don't want to give the impression that you can just throw caution to the wind. However, if you avoid the hardest drugs like meth and heroin, if you do your research and use harm reduction, the chances of you having any problems from drugs, is very low, it is vastly exaggerated.

said by a person who says he just wants to die - your neurotransmitters are fucked buddy,

obviously I can't say whether they were fucked first and then you took drugs or if drugs had any negative effect on you, but the fact is you're fucked and so you cannot vouch for the safety of narcotics with your own example



As I already explained to you my problems are entirely environmental. If I lived in a rational libertarian country right now I would not feel anything like that.

mrz wrote:
Rotting Penis wrote:Self-improvement with drugs? Are you fucking kidding me?

Look at MRZ, his brain turned into mush.

He's a degenerate junkie who wants to drag everybody else down with him, because misery loves company. That's what I noticed about all the drug junkies I knew in my life.


Why are you so rude and hostile to me? What have I done to offend you? I've done nothing but tell you the truth, it's just the truth is counter to the doxa you accumulated from your society is all.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/basics/jealousy

mrz wrote:
Rotting Penis wrote:said by a person who says he just wants to die - your neurotransmitters are fucked buddy,

obviously I can't say whether they were fucked first and then you took drugs or if drugs had any negative effect on you, but the fact is you're fucked and so you cannot vouch for the safety of narcotics with your own example



As I already explained to you my problems are entirely environmental. If I lived in a rational libertarian country right now I would not feel anything like that.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1014994&start=30

there are no environmental problems in peace times in modern society

Rotting Penis wrote:
mrz wrote:

As I already explained to you my problems are entirely environmental. If I lived in a rational libertarian country right now I would not feel anything like that.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1014994&start=30

there are no environmental problems in peace times in modern society


As I previously explained I live in a Feminist-Christian police state, and being neither a Feminist nor a Christian, am therefore exposed to a hostile environment.

mrz wrote:
Rotting Penis wrote:viewtopic.php?f=2&t=1014994&start=30

there are no environmental problems in peace times in modern society


As I previously explained I live in a Feminist-Christian police state, and being neither a Feminist nor a Christian, am therefore exposed to a hostile environment.

As I previously explained it's irrelevant though.

Everybody lives in the same environment, only you (and very very few other people) complain like that - hence the proof it's not the environment but you.

Environment is constans, you are a variable.

Rotting Penis wrote:
mrz wrote:
As I previously explained I live in a Feminist-Christian police state, and being neither a Feminist nor a Christian, am therefore exposed to a hostile environment.

As I previously explained it's irrelevant though.

Everybody lives in the same environment, only you (and very very few other people) complain like that - hence the proof it's not the environment but you.

Environment is constans, you are a variable.



The overwhelming of people in USA are Christian-Feminist zombies of course they don't complain they have implemented a police state that is to their advantage. Throw me in a free libertarian country and I will have nothing to complain about.

mrz wrote:
Rotting Penis wrote:As I previously explained it's irrelevant though.

Everybody lives in the same environment, only you (and very very few other people) complain like that - hence the proof it's not the environment but you.

Environment is constans, you are a variable.



The overwhelming of people in USA are Christian-Feminist zombies of course they don't complain they have implemented a police state that is to their advantage. Throw me in a free libertarian country and I will have nothing to complain about.

LOL, you are free to go to Uruguay whenever you want.

But you won't because fear stops you. Fear that nothing would change and you would still be the same depressed vegetable you are now.

Rotting Penis wrote:
mrz wrote:

The overwhelming of people in USA are Christian-Feminist zombies of course they don't complain they have implemented a police state that is to their advantage. Throw me in a free libertarian country and I will have nothing to complain about.

LOL, you are free to go to Uruguay whenever you want.

But you won't because fear stops you. Fear that nothing would change and you would still be the same depressed vegetable you are now.


No the fact that it is actually hard to move to a new country where they speak a completely different language and have low English speaking rates is the primary thing that stops me, if there were an English speaking country with laws like Uruguay I would already be there.
PreviousNext

Topic Tags

Return to Race

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests