Only good looking guys can act out of the norm (STUDY!!!!)

Share your experiences with the opposite sex. Suggest ways to improve your success. Analyze the behavior of females in real life and online. Rant and rave about females. Show the importance of looks pertaining to attracting females and other social situations. Discuss aesthetics and the science of attractiveness. Exchange health, nutrition and looksmaxing tips.

Saw this on bluepill central aka reddit "red" pill

http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comm ... _will_not/

Despite facial unattractiveness, a male will not be perceived negatively by females while he is conforming to social conventions and behaving well, but the same unattractive male will be viewed extremely negatively if he decides that he will violate these social conventions.

http://link.springer.com/article/10.100 ... ltext.html

If you're UGLY: blend in with the crowd and don't make a fuzz, stay home playing video games and DO NOT chat up women.

If you're handsome: doesn't matter what you do. what women consider harrasment from an ugly guy, is called confident flirting instead



Boring. This is at least the third topic linking the same "study" for the last month or so.

Some people have privilidges in life and the rest have to follow the cookie cutter path. Get over it. It's no differet than how the top 1% in wealth doesn't have to conform to wage slavery while the other 99% are forced to. That's why it's called a privildge, since the vast majority of humanity must conform to norms that plain suck

Lol, you totally misunderstood the study (in fact probably didn't even read it right? And got all your interpretation of it from Reddit? lol)
This is why you guys are so retarded. You just listen to each other in your stupid manosphere hug-boxes.

The study involved two questions - asking women whether they would let a stranger borrow a pen (low violation) and take their picture for a modeling assignment (high violation). Some were shown attractive guys pictures, some were shown unattractive guys.

Here's what the findings of the study actually were

(from the actual study published here http://link.springer.com/article/10.100 ... ltext.html)

Chi square analyses were conducted to examine the differences in compliance levels. These analyses involved Chi square tests using Attractiveness as the independent variable and compliance as the dependent variable. Separate Chi squares were conducted examining both the low violation and high violation conditions. In the low violation scenario, the facially attractive male and the facially unattractive male did not produce a significantly different compliance rate, χ2(1, 169) = .14 ns. In most cases, the participants said they would loan the male requester a pencil (96 %). In the high violation, the facially attractive male and the facially unattractive male also did not produce a significantly different compliance rate χ2(1, 169) = .39 ns. In most cases, the participants said they would not allow the male requester to take their picture (93 %). Thus, there was only a main effect of norm violation regarding compliance.



Lol at you retards so desperate for "scientific evidence" to back up your (incorrect) world views that you don't even bother to read the studies and just cream yourself at some retard redditard's (mis)interpretation.



adamned wrote:Lol, you totally misunderstood the study (in fact probably didn't even read it right? And got all your interpretation of it from Reddit? lol)
This is why you guys are so retarded. You just listen to each other in your stupid manosphere hug-boxes.

Lol at you retards so desperate for "scientific evidence" to back up your (incorrect) world views that you don't even bother to read the studies and just cream yourself at some retard redditard's (mis)interpretation.

Are you even capable of reading? OP said that only goodlooking males can act out of the norm,which is true and confirmed by the study :lol:

sfff.PNG
sfff.PNG (13.33 KiB) Viewed 3678 times


Even the goddamn title chosen by the publisher confirms it, :lol:

"You’re OK Until You Misbehave: How Norm Violations Magnify the Attractiveness Devil Effect"
Image

What Kiwifarmers said was biased,misinformed, and used faulty reasoning to explain an over-generalization of the mental states of those that frequent Sluthate. They wouldn't understand this though, seeing as very few people are ever questioned on the validity of what they say over here.

adamned wrote:Lol, you totally misunderstood the study (in fact probably didn't even read it right? And got all your interpretation of it from Reddit? lol)
This is why you guys are so retarded. You just listen to each other in your stupid manosphere hug-boxes.

The study involved two questions - asking women whether they would let a stranger borrow a pen (low violation) and take their picture for a modeling assignment (high violation). Some were shown attractive guys pictures, some were shown unattractive guys.

Here's what the findings of the study actually were

(from the actual study published here http://link.springer.com/article/10.100 ... ltext.html)

Chi square analyses were conducted to examine the differences in compliance levels. These analyses involved Chi square tests using Attractiveness as the independent variable and compliance as the dependent variable. Separate Chi squares were conducted examining both the low violation and high violation conditions. In the low violation scenario, the facially attractive male and the facially unattractive male did not produce a significantly different compliance rate, χ2(1, 169) = .14 ns. In most cases, the participants said they would loan the male requester a pencil (96 %). In the high violation, the facially attractive male and the facially unattractive male also did not produce a significantly different compliance rate χ2(1, 169) = .39 ns. In most cases, the participants said they would not allow the male requester to take their picture (93 %). Thus, there was only a main effect of norm violation regarding compliance.



Lol at you retards so desperate for "scientific evidence" to back up your (incorrect) world views that you don't even bother to read the studies and just cream yourself at some retard redditard's (mis)interpretation.


While I admit the people on this forum tend to do that, this was the one study that seemed to draw a redpill conclusion.

However the study is a bit curious, as it claims to have changed the "brow" and "chin" and claimed these were features that would deem someone more tolerant to the man acting outlandishly (i can only see this if they made the guy a complete slack-jaw)

It also corrected for facial symmetry which makes a lot more sense.



Thanks for confirming what everyone here has already known for years. :lol:
What is better to be born good or to overcome your evil nature through much effort and discipline?

Bojack wrote:Thanks for confirming what everyone here has already known for years. :lol:


yes people HERE do know this stuff but it should be more public knowledge

Bojack wrote:Thanks for confirming what everyone here has already known for years. :lol:


Seeing quite a lot of these 'more proof' threads. Really starting to get annoying. :roll:

I honestly feel the same way about ugly or fat girls hitting on me.

First off... Very insulting, and definitely Harrassment.

cope
the only pets you need are teen sex slaves in your basement and the poneys you fuck in the barn

Image

Topic Tags

Return to Shitty Advice

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 95 guests