The ulterior motive of lookism-based feminism

Share your experiences with the opposite sex. Suggest ways to improve your success. Analyze the behavior of females in real life and online. Rant and rave about females. Show the importance of looks pertaining to attracting females and other social situations. Discuss aesthetics and the science of attractiveness. Exchange health, nutrition and looksmaxing tips.

It seems like there's a common principle behind feminism when it comes to looks and pairing: maximize female options and opportunities in the sexual market while putting down unattractive to average men and subjugating attractive ones.

The ultimate feminist utopia would look like this:

Any woman, no matter how average... or even below average such as fat, ugly or bothersome, should have lots of casual sex with hot dudes in her teens and twenties while every unattractive to average man around her is not allowed to make any advances, under threat of slander, condemnation or even jail. If she regrets any drunken encounter with a guy she's not attracted to, it's rape (see the Ched Evans case). If the ugly or plain average quiet guy at work -- perhaps hassled by his colleagues for not talking to girls -- asks her for a social coffee, its sexual harassment. "What a sneaky pervert!". In her thirties, when she's now past her prime and all the fun is nearly over, she's entitled to a average-looking provider whom she can divorce-rape at any time and still profit from after divorce.

Just look at this whole "nerd entitlement" or lonely male entitlement bullshit feminists perpetrate. They shame and attack any unattractive man who complains about being alone by simply tacking labels such as entitled, "lazy", "psycho", "misogynist", "you just want a supermodel", "no social skills" onto them. arbitrarily. The truth is that these men simply repulse women because of their looks and any expression of their sexuality offends and insults them. Feminism gives women a foundation to disguise intuitive disgust and spite into something rational and noble. It's just another instance of female sexuality being elevated into something beyond instincts.

It's a real joke how feminists are quick to call men entitled, when it's only women who can write articles such as this, this, this, this or this below without being lambasted.

http://www.vagabondish.com/female-forei ... Kh2lWAi.99
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/xojane-/o ... lp00000592
http://elitedaily.com/dating/men-pssies ... es/746965/
https://archive.today/Ch2Hu
https://thetallblog.wordpress.com/2012/ ... e-are-you/
Potato-faced ones with nothing left inside
That girls cannot love
That girls cannot love
That we all...

Potato-faced ones with nothing left inside
That girls cannot love
That girls cannot love
That we all...

And now I know why 5+ women are messing me around
I don't want to know
I don't want to know
I don't want to know
(x3)

Broken hearts make it rain
Broken hearts make it rain
Broken hearts make it rain
(x14)

Pieces of a rag doll sub 6 mankind
That you can't create
That we can't control
That we can...

Pieces of a rag doll mankind
That you can't create
That we can't control
That we can...

But when I see you messing me around
And I don't want to know
I don't want to know
I don't want to know.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmnS9jTcwJE



That girl in the Huffingtonpost article is a fucking liar, there's no way she was only messaged twice in a month. I'm guessing she didn't count the hundreds of ugly/average guys that messaged her each week.

Yep. You need an above average face to live a decent life in 2015. Lookism is only getting worse

There’s no door-holding, no hand-holding and definitely no free drinks

lol at her entitlement




Topic Tags

Return to Shitty Advice

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 94 guests