Why women LIE about men's LOOKS mattering.

Share your experiences with the opposite sex. Suggest ways to improve your success. Analyze the behavior of females in real life and online. Rant and rave about females. Show the importance of looks pertaining to attracting females and other social situations. Discuss aesthetics and the science of attractiveness. Exchange health, nutrition and looksmaxing tips.

They are AFRAID of what would happen. They would LOSE the grossly inflated sexaul market power they wield today. Guys would no longer be so eager to do them special favors, and men would be MUCH more wary about getting married. Guys would no longer be such easy targets for the deceptive games so many women play for materialistic gains. Women are SCARED of that truth getting out!!

The majority of men have been married and have had girlfriends, but many of THOSE men are blissfully unaware of how fake their mate's "love" is . Women find the majority of men unattractive, yet settle for those same guys for practical, social and cultural reasons. Paradoxically, the majority of THOSE guys have NEVER experienced what REAL love from a woman is like! Her practical needs simply outweigh her need for love, and she is under social pressure to maintain a fascade of love for her man. If only those men knew this...

Think about it. What do you think would happen to the dating/marriage game if most men realized just HOW much looks affected their true market value? What do you think would happen if those "normalfags" woke up to the fact that women can ONLY have romantic emotions toward a man who is conventionally physically attractive? If men want to regain the value in society they have lost, they MUST wake up to the redpill truth about male looks and the games women play.

Women would not be able to get away with the blatant disrespect that is so commonplace nowadays. Male knowledge of the true nature of female sexuality would make a woman's erotic capital less effective in gaining special favors and perks from men. Her erotic costs for those special favors would be much higher. They would also have to bring their standards in line with their actual market value and not be so demanding in their mate search. Men as a group would NO LONGER TOLERATE the pricey behavior women get away with so easily today. We would probably see a return to a much more traditional approach to courtship and marriage. The sexual market would be far more balanced between the sexes, like it used to be. Women very well might return to traditional ways... WILLINGLY...as they are faced with the EVEN WORSE end result of unrestricted and uncontrolled female sexuality, without a male counterbalance in place in the sexual market.

The 60s sexual revolution had a major flaw. It allowed women to get fucked by guys WAY out of their league, but the sexual revolution did not account for the intense internal conflict many women feel between marriage and sexual attraction. Today, the Sisterhood is in the position of trying to explain away damning proof of the true nature of female sexuality. Actions speak louder than words. What men see does not match the words, and not every man is so gullible. Female sexual privaledge is only possible when men remain decieved and unaware of how female sexuality operates.

THAT is why women lie about looks! They KNOW what would happen to their privaledged position in the sexual market. Don't kid yourselves, guys. THEY KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY'RE DOING! If a women is sexually attracted to you, she reveals a part of herself that is a CLOSELY GUARDED SECRET`she keeps from the average-looking guys she dates.

Cheating is commonplace because women typically settle in the looks department for relationships and marriage. They cannot truly _LOVE_ a man who does not spark her SEXUAL desire IMMEDIATELY - on LOOKS ALONE! The guy usually cheats because she isn't putting out, and the woman usually cheats because she was never truly sexually attracted to her man in the first place. A man generally does not require a "7" to get sexually aroused, but a women DOES. She has to deal with the internal conflict between the desire for companionship and family, versus her sexual needs. I belive guys would be even worse than women as cheaters if they were in the typical female position. As much as women cheat, the amount of restraint they exhibit before finally succumbing to the temptation is admirable. Too many men do not know how truly easy it is for a woman to cheat if she really wants to. They do it simply because they can, where doing the same takes a lot more effort to accomplish for a man. That's why most female cheating is typically more spontanteous, while a man's cheating is typically more planned and methodical.

Honestly, while a return to traditional ways might be largely beneficial for men, it has its problems. There's gotta be a better way to solve these problems, without women having to settle for a guy they aren't physically attracted to, and taking away the freedoms of another human being. More guys would have mates in a more traditional sexual market, but a pragmatic approach to marriage absolutely CANNOT be sustainable without one gender submitting to the other's total CONTROL, and SERIOUS restraints on divorce. The true nature of female sexuality is THE MAIN FUNDAMENTAL RESAON why women were classically put under such tight constraints. THAT is why feminism and female sexuality is often so tightly interlinked. Notice how much they talk about SEX and SEXUALITY in their writings? That is NOT a coincidence!

I say fuck all this slavery and settling shit. This is the 21st century. Mass male looksmaxxing, legalization of anabolic steroids under a physician's care, and publicly available, IMPROVED cosmetic surgery for the aesthetically disabled males, would be the more civilized, progressive, and EASIER-to-accomplish solution. You can call this idea crazy, but as gender problems get progressively worse in the future - and they WILL -, a dramatic solution WILL eventually be necessary. Putting men on gear and under the knife would be far more efficient, peaceful, moral and beneficial, than regulating women to second-class status and glorified prostitution. That's the shit that caused feminism in the first place. In a world of erotic equality, men wouldn't need MGTOW and MRA's, and women wouldn't feel the need for feminism.
Pandora's Box: The Men's Sexual Revolution. Free ebook here:
w/Pandora%27s_Box:_The_Men%27s_Sexual_Revolution

Stop Living The Big Lie. Download it here:
uploads/stop-living-the-big-lie.pdf






or you could just fuck escorts and play videogames
Image
redpil: i fucked you're mom
redpil: no one uses the term redpil correctly



Chicks don't do this for fear of guys giving up. They will still be able to fuck and use the shit out of Chads around the world.

They do it because they are afraid of an ER attack on a MUCH grander scale by more than just one person. Could you imagine what would happen if a chick just straight up said to a guy "you aren't good looking enough for me/You don't have enough LMS/You're too autistic?" It would cause an incel revolution, especially amongst autists, many of whom have been secretly planning a bloody revolution anyways.
Chad nuthugger crew
Raped as a child and accused of rape as an adult
Anti-Autist crew
35+, 8 blowjobs but no D in V

You niggas spend all day on here coming up with conspiracy theories about why you can't get pussy LMAOOOOOO
Image Image

kalifornia310 wrote:You niggas spend all day on here coming up with conspiracy theories about why you can't get pussy LMAOOOOOO

kent pls
Will steroids get me a GF??
no

Nihilism+ wrote:Chicks don't do this for fear of guys giving up. They will still be able to fuck and use the shit out of Chads around the world.

They do it because they are afraid of an ER attack on a MUCH grander scale by more than just one person. Could you imagine what would happen if a chick just straight up said to a guy "you aren't good looking enough for me/You don't have enough LMS/You're too autistic?" It would cause an incel revolution, especially amongst autists, many of whom have been secretly planning a bloody revolution anyways.


Funny you mention that. If something isnt done about the incel problem, and the number of looks-aware incels rises, mass violence is a very real possibility.

This is painful man, this is why every man should be redpilled before they reach the high school age. At the very least they'll know of what hell awaits them.
What is better to be born good or to overcome your evil nature through much effort and discipline?

Bojack fuck that at the very least they know highschool is one of the few chances to get young slim girlfriend,tell them that shit in there last year of junior highschool aka ages 13-14.

Women fear that they will be attacked or even murdered if they told a man he was sub standard in appearance. That's the main reason. Instead they put on a front...an obfuscate that they are open to every man and non-discriminative. It is a way to suck in beta satellites and to give those men hope (all while feeding her ego that so many guys like her - "gosh I'm SOOOO beautiful"). It is really quite sickening when you think about how duped some men are, and happily remain guarding whiteknights of the friendzone whilst she fucks Chads.
Potato-faced ones with nothing left inside
That girls cannot love
That girls cannot love
That we all...

Potato-faced ones with nothing left inside
That girls cannot love
That girls cannot love
That we all...

And now I know why 5+ women are messing me around
I don't want to know
I don't want to know
I don't want to know
(x3)

Broken hearts make it rain
Broken hearts make it rain
Broken hearts make it rain
(x14)

Pieces of a rag doll sub 6 mankind
That you can't create
That we can't control
That we can...

Pieces of a rag doll mankind
That you can't create
That we can't control
That we can...

But when I see you messing me around
And I don't want to know
I don't want to know
I don't want to know.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmnS9jTcwJE

Paradigm Shift wrote:
Funny you mention that. If something isnt done about the incel problem, and the number of looks-aware incels rises, mass violence is a very real possibility.


Great, and then instead of war on terror, president Hilary Clinton will declare war on incels.

strongbrowbra wrote:Very legit, I actually read the book and think it's one of the best books written in our time. Paradigm shift are you the author?


Yes. Wow, thank you for the compliment :D . Its definitely unorthodox in its final solution, but I think we have some crazy times ahead of us. A sexual market that allows female freedom without a male counterbalance is unsustainable. If we dont fix the incel problem, society is fucked.

sysiphus wrote:
Paradigm Shift wrote:
Funny you mention that. If something isnt done about the incel problem, and the number of looks-aware incels rises, mass violence is a very real possibility.


Great, and then instead of war on terror, president Hilary Clinton will declare war on incels.


Incel in a big enough popualtion will definitely breed domestic terrorism. One of the main motivations in writing my book is to try and prevent that from happening. It's why I stress that going ER is bad, bad, bad for the incel cause.

strongbrowbra wrote:
Paradigm Shift wrote:
Yes. Wow, thank you for the compliment :D . Its definitely unorthodox in its final solution, but I think we have some crazy times ahead of us. A sexual market that allows female freedom without a male counterbalance is unsustainable. If we dont fix the incel problem, society is fucked.


I really don't think stated anything crazy. As far as unorthodox goes... I guess lol since most people will not take roids and PS going mainstream. The big hurdle the solutions you present remain in the bluepill/matrix reality of some people. They simply might not accept the truths we share. However with time I think it will become more of a reality as more and more are waking up to the topic of lookism.

As women continue to be more open in expressing the real nature of their sexuality, more men will find their bluepill views shattered. As more men wake up, more men will redpill others. People laugh at treatment for ugly people right now, but eventually desperate times will call for desperate measures. I really hope people choose the civilized option when that time comes.
Btw, here is a powerful advantage state sponsored looksmaxing has over the other options: Women would stand behind it, because it would be their only way to avoid a return to second class citizenship.

strongbrowbra wrote:Very legit, I actually read the book and think it's one of the best books written in our time. Paradigm shift are you the author?


Which book?

Paradigm Shift wrote:
strongbrowbra wrote:
I really don't think stated anything crazy. As far as unorthodox goes... I guess lol since most people will not take roids and PS going mainstream. The big hurdle the solutions you present remain in the bluepill/matrix reality of some people. They simply might not accept the truths we share. However with time I think it will become more of a reality as more and more are waking up to the topic of lookism.

As women continue to be more open in expressing the real nature of their sexuality, more men will find their bluepill views shattered. As more men wake up, more men will redpill others. People laugh at treatment for ugly people right now, but eventually desperate times will call for desperate measures. I really hope people choose the civilized option when that time comes.
Btw, here is a powerful advantage state sponsored looksmaxing has over the other options: Women would stand behind it, because it would be their only way to avoid a return to second class citizenship.


Thank you for this thread. First time I encounter someone trying to solve the problem in a realistic way.

Returning to the old order will not work even if that's what we want.

Women just wouldn't go along with it and they are now the more powerful sex - they control access to sex, are responsible for at least 70% of consumption, are more educated on average, and are more capable of collective action.

Men do have an advantage at the high end. The vast majority of movers and shakers are men. Problem is these are very high status males who benefit from polygyny.

It would be like having the secret code to a nuclear bomb would you let someone else have it?

strongbrowbra wrote:
greensuited wrote:
Which book?


Check out paradigm shift's sig.


I don't see any sig. Can you link to the book? TYIA

EDIT: Okay, I was viewing the simplified layout.

Here's the link in case someone else is looking:
Pandora's Box: Men's Sexual Revolution
http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=035 ... 1329501441
http://www.scribd.com/doc/251680043/Men ... Box#scribd
Last edited by greensuited on Wed Apr 15, 2015 2:21 am, edited 2 times in total.

Topic Tags

Return to Shitty Advice

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Google [Bot] and 94 guests