Makes sense
Not surprised at least it's quantifiable now
- Board index
- ‹ Main
- ‹ Shitty Advice
- ‹ Looks = 50%, Money = 15%, Status = 35%
Looks = 50%, Money = 15%, Status = 35%
21 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Hardly
MistGeburt3000 wrote:More like :
Status 55 percent
Looks 25 percent
money 20 percent
Legit. An autistic O'Pry look-alike who lives with his mom and has no job and a 65 year old ugly bald Billionaire probably have about the same potential to slay.
[img/]http://i58.tinypic.com/5uhenn.jpg[/img]
RodgerRabbit wrote:Trying to fix yourself is literally a race against the clock. It's a catch 22. By the time you've fixed all the flaws that prevented you from slaying, you will have lost the one thing most essential to slaying in the first place -- youth.
NewGenious119 wrote:This idea that nobody owes anyone anything completely goes against the entire point of even having a society in the first place. If society doesn't owe an individual person anything, then the individual owes society nothing either, so don't be surprised when they take their frustration out on the world.
There is absolutely NO GOOD reason why, in the 21st century, every person shouldn't have their basic needs met. That means food, shelter, clothing, and transportation for all and, yes, if you are a male, sexual access to attractive females as that is considered a basic need for men as well.
Leebyunghun wrote:The number one source of strife in human existence is the inequality of looks among the male species.
germanDream wrote:a woman would fuck a cute dog or horse over an average faced man ANY day of the week. its not even close. women are repulsed by non male model men
PuaKiller wrote:Most women couldn't last a month as an incel male. They'd suicide. Prostitution would be legal worldwide and virgin shaming would cease if women were put in the shoes of an incel male for even a month. They couldn't handle it.
firehaze wrote:If a girl has never made it obvious that she likes you then you're a lot more subhuman than you think.
http://twitter.com/incelvoice
#NoHymenNoDiamond
Anti-Degeneracy crew
https://www.reddit.com/r/Truecels/
cats wrote:
Status (aka Personality)
Those are two different things.
Looks just start to matter more and more as time goes on, each generation cares more about looks than the one before it.
mfz wrote:cats wrote:
Status (aka Personality)
Those are two different things.
Personality is how you talk to people. Status is how people talk to you.
OmegaKV wrote:mfz wrote:
Those are two different things.
Personality is how you talk to people. Status is how people talk to you.
Status is your position in society.That's usually correlated with money but not always.
For example,Bill Gates has more money than Justin Bieber,but Justin Bieber has more Status than all of rich ceos combined.
cats wrote:
Taking the data from here for actual importance and crunching the numbers, then rounding for niceness ^
Looks = 50%
Money = 15%
Status (aka Personality) = 35%
Attractiveness is everything that makes a girl wanna fuck you; looks being a small part of this.
cats wrote:Reposting this cuz it breaks it down well.
Taking the data from here for actual importance and crunching the numbers, then rounding for niceness ^
Looks = 50%
Money = 15%
Status (aka Personality) = 35%
Does the blue line represent how attractive men have to be, or what male respondonders say about how attrractive women have to be?
MistGeburt3000 wrote:More like :
Status 55 percent
Looks 25 percent
money 20 percent
More like Looks 100%
ironically, good looking dudes make more money, masculine looking dudes are more "leader" like, aka more money, and good looking/masculine dudes have better status and look better no matter what they wear.
more like looks 75%, things related or enhanced by looks 20%, and 5% luck, random, etc....
or be born rich, etc...
more like looks 75%, things related or enhanced by looks 20%, and 5% luck, random, etc....
or be born rich, etc...
I guess I'm a mathcel because what the above numbers are actually saying is:
Looks = 21.2%
Personality = 10.2%
Money = 2.6%
Other Stuff = 66.0%
My guess is "other stuff" involves a host of other factors more related to availability than actual attraction.
However the new more accurate percentages would indicate that looks are more than twice as important as personality and more than 8 times as important as money.
Looks = 21.2%
Personality = 10.2%
Money = 2.6%
Other Stuff = 66.0%
My guess is "other stuff" involves a host of other factors more related to availability than actual attraction.
However the new more accurate percentages would indicate that looks are more than twice as important as personality and more than 8 times as important as money.
When you square a correlation coefficient (the above numbers I listed), in layman's terms what you get is a percentage of how much the dependent variable (in this case relationship initiation according to the graph) is explained by the independent variable (in this case looks, personality or money). So when you have three independent variables with three different correlation coefficients, when you square those coefficients you get how much the variance in one independent variable explains the variance in the dependent variable.
When those numbers add up to less than 1, the remaining variance is termed "unexplained" meaning simply things other than the three independent variables listed were driving the remaining variance in the dependent variable. In other words, this is "other stuff" whatever that might be.
In truth it's a little more complicated than that, but for our purposes that's it in a nutshell.
When those numbers add up to less than 1, the remaining variance is termed "unexplained" meaning simply things other than the three independent variables listed were driving the remaining variance in the dependent variable. In other words, this is "other stuff" whatever that might be.
In truth it's a little more complicated than that, but for our purposes that's it in a nutshell.
-Mike
This study is ancient and it's dishonest to equate status with personality. They're not the same.
21 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Topic Tags
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Fabie, Google [Bot] and 99 guests