Read the comments section of this article. It should be an eye opener if you believe most women are actually into the men they are with. Sub-7 men either get settled into relationships or are incel. Real romantic feelings from a woman for sub-7's is rare. Women have a tendency to get into relationships for men they are lukewarm about, and that is why so many guys deny the importance of looks. MOST relationships are the settling/practical kind, because most men are sub 7's.
Settling is a big reason why we have so much infidelity, sexless marriages, a sky high divorce rate and unstable relationships.
The sex eventually gets rationed after she thinks she has got him locked down:
Imagine if the couple argued every day whether if they could have sex.
Man: "Let's have sex."
Man: "Why don't you have sex with me as often?"
Woman: "Because you don't love me as much as you used to. Why should I love you back?"
Man: "I love you, really."
Woman: "You used to show me how much you loved me. You stopped doing that and took me for granted. Have you done anything recently to show that you love me?"
Man: "Why do you think I'm taking you for granted? Last week I took you out shopping."
Woman: "That did not count. You argued with me that I cannot buy shoes. You ruined my day."
Man: "You have more than enough shoes."
Woman: "I spent my own money on the shoes, okay? You have no right to argue with me on that."
Man: "But I gave you a free ride to the mall. I also paid for the gasoline and carried your bags." (What he really meant: "Yes I do have a right to criticize you for buying too many shoes. This is because I also spent my time and money helping you to buy the shoes. For example, I gave you a free ride to the mall. I also paid for the gasoline and carried your bags.")
Woman: "That does not make you entitled to sex." (What she really meant: "Just because you gave me a free ride, paid for the gasoline and carried my bags, that does not make you entitled to sex." This is because she thought that the man was trying to convince her to have sex just because he gave a free ride and paid for the gasoline. But this wasn't the man's intent. The man was just explaining why he believes he has the right to criticize her on buying shoes. She therefore misinterpreted his words and, in turn, made a strawman argument.)
Man: "You are not entitled to my money either." (Responding to strawman argument.)
Woman: "I never felt entitled to your money. You are the one being entitled."
Man: "No, I don't feel entitled to sex." (Responding to strawman argument.)
Woman: "Yes, you do feel entitled. If not, why do you feel you have the right for sex just because you gave a free ride, paid for the gasoline and carried my bags? You ignored the fact that you ruined my day because you argued with me why I cannot buy shoes. You treat me as if money will make me love you again. It cannot. I'm not a commodity that could be bought. I'm a human being." (Strawman argument.)
Man: "I told you, I do not feel entitled to sex. I was just explaining why I have the right to criticize you about the shoes..." (Responding to strawman argument.)
Woman: "Yes, you do feel entitled. If not, why do you keep on arguing with me to have sex with you as if I owe you anything?" (Woman misinterpreted his responses to her strawman arguments as persistent arguing to have sex.)
Woman: [Posts on feminist forums complaining how incels think they are entitled to sex.]
- A helpful flowchart to assist our incel brothers in determining when they are owed sex.
- Incel thinks they have countered the "you're not entitled to sex" argument, by saying they're entitled to sex. Claims those who have sex have some form of 'insider knowledge', and that *we're* the entitled ones.
- You didn’t have sex with me, so you’re not entitled to help. FIFY
- YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO SEX!
The woman sighs, "I should have never dated an incel. So much arguing, entitlement and abuse...I could not tolerate that anymore."
So much arguing in the relationship, just because the man tries to have sex with the woman who is not mutual attracted to him.
So much arguing in the relationship, because the woman demands the man to take her out on trips and dinners to compensate his for lack of attractiveness...
Eventually, because of the arguing, the couple grew to resent each other and breaks up.
Then, the woman complains on Twitter of being abused by incels/nerds she has dated:
She most likely dated nerds only for the money not because she is attracted to them. Conflicts will arise when the sex gets rationed or if the man does not spend enough money for her to compensate for his lack of attractiveness.
The replies to her post are quite hateful against nerds/incels. They try to explain the alleged "abuse" and "entitlement" by blaming things may not be relevant to the actual conflict such as "nerds have no social skills", "nerds did not learn how to be respectful towards women because they have not dated any", "nerds are misogynists, that's why they couldn't get any women when young" or "nerds have revenge fantasies of not getting girls when young." People believe that "there is something wrong with the personality of nerds/incels." More generally, people tend to blame personality factors instead of situational factors. (See the fundamental attribution error.)
Yet the real reason might be caused the lack of sex (from the male end) or the lack of money (from the female end).
Lack of mutual sexual attraction leads to lack of sex. Lack of sex, in turn, leads to arguing and conflicts, and accusations of "entitlement" and "abuse" on both sides.
The woman also demands free meals, free trips and free jewelry from the man to compensate for her lack of sexual attraction to him. This also leads to arguing and conflicts, and accusations of "entitlement" and "abuse" on both sides.
- Man jumps to death from mall balcony because of argument over his girlfriend buying shoes.
- A man brought his wife a new car because she wrecked her first car but she was ungrateful that he bought a cheap car.
In an ideal relationship, both parties are genuinely attracted to each other and thus genuinely desire to have sex with each other. In such relationship, the sex isn't offered based on the whims and fancies of the woman. Sex would be a given. Regardless whether the woman perceives the male was a "good boy" or a "bad boy", she has sex with him. No arguments would be started by the lack of sex because it wouldn't be a commodity that could be withheld by the female at any time.
Also, in the ideal relationship, when both parties mutually desire each other and see each other as equals, the woman would not have to demand the man to buy her dinners, gifts, etc. just to compensate for his lack of attractiveness. This also leads to less arguments and less conflicts.