Escorpion wrote:All those women are way below his league. For him to fuck them would be like an average guy fucking a load of ugly women. I could walk into a nightclub and fuck an ugly woman with ease, but what's the point? This is how super-Chad's feel about average women fancying them.

makingmoney wrote:

Escorpion wrote:All those women are way below his league. For him to fuck them would be like an average guy fucking a load of ugly women. I could walk into a nightclub and fuck an ugly woman with ease, but what's the point? This is how super-Chad's feel about average women fancying them.

Exactly, there's only a few women in that list I'd ever consider taking out on a date and I'm nowhere near as good looking as that guy.

A bunch of them I'd pitch for sex, my place or there's and if they made it that easy I'd go for it, but wouldn't accept having to meet them out in public first or listen to their crap for too long etc. not worth it.

KnightCavalier wrote:It is really overwhelming the amount of girls that a Chad can amass so quickly. I guess in a few weeks or months this dude could monopolize a harem of hundreds or even thousands of women.

I will capture screen list of followers, since the list of match votes appears with pictures blurred. And credits are required to reveal these blurred profiles.

In order to check out the followers of my dummy profile, just I open the left menu with one simple tap on the icon on the top left. In the top left corner I see the number of current followers, and tap on it to see a detailed list and screenshots. So we can see the quality of the followers, in terms of attractiveness. I will try to capture a wide amount of these thumbnails.

wannabe wrote:

makingmoney wrote:Exactly, there's only a few women in that list I'd ever consider taking out on a date and I'm nowhere near as good looking as that guy.

A bunch of them I'd pitch for sex, my place or there's and if they made it that easy I'd go for it, but wouldn't accept having to meet them out in public first or listen to their crap for too long etc. not worth it.

Note: the experiment has been done in Germany which is not known for beautiful slim hotties, so i guess the best quality you can find there is the one shown in those pictures.
If he tried Poland or Sweden for example i guess it would get better.

I have tried an experiment like this with a MM with a face slightly less cute than that, slightly shorter height and about the same muscle mass/bf... he got matches and responses from better girls just because i tried other countries not germany nor uk.

Peppers wrote:One good guess- we can’t be sure of any of this, there is insufficient data- is that the female homo sapiens evolved for group sex. Lower class females- closer to nature than upper class ones wreathed in Puritan values- are “sluts”. The two 12 year olds who had sex with multiple men recently (court case) are probably closer to female nature than a sniffy madam with a college degree. Anecdotal all this, of course, but it may be why they make more noise than men during sex (calling attention from more males) which is useless if there’s just two of you doing it in your hut. The penis is scoop shaped to evacuate the vagina of previous males’ sperm (the foreskin is probably functional here too). The modern female instinct to “party” and the female urge to sexually display at such gatherings is a remnant of past behaviour. The female in a monogamous relationship, evolutionary primed for a long session of hard shagging by multiple males is thus left unfulfilled by the usually inadequate attempts of one male, who evolved to be really only interested in his orgasm and to come pretty rapidly (“premature ejaculation”). Women are hunting around for the minority who can last a long time and fulfill that sexual need; hence the fascination since the sexual revolution of improving male performance. Left to his own devices, men are happy with two minutes and a spooge and roll over and go to sleep.

Oh, and needless to say, porn is a simulation of that gang-bang scenario which is why we like it more than girls. We’re primed to be standing around watching other guys have their turn; the girls are primed to be in the thick of it, not watching.

The true reason for a small number of alphas and a large number of betas is that the betas are the normal males who just can’t satisfy a woman in a monogamous relationship, so get dumped or overlooked all the time. The lucky Alpha is the male whose visual virility is sufficient to simulate the combined prowess of several other males. So-called “hypergamy” is a natural consequence of advanced economic systems with great wealth disparities- a very recent development for humans. What the girls are really homing in on is the virile males; and frequently getting it wrong. But you can’t blame them for trying.

CM8 wrote:He's very good looking but I have seen better.

Try Julian Schalk or Sven Csongar. American sluts are too fucking stupid and insular to have heard of them, as they are relatively obscure European models. This guy is arguably better looking than Csongar, who is slightly twinky, but Schalk is better looking than him.

KnightCavalier wrote:

CM8 wrote:He's very good looking but I have seen better.

Try Julian Schalk or Sven Csongar. American sluts are too fucking stupid and insular to have heard of them, as they are relatively obscure European models. This guy is arguably better looking than Csongar, who is slightly twinky, but Schalk is better looking than him.

Ok dude, testing female responsiveness with Julian Schalk's pics:

Views: 621

Likes: 217

Fabie wrote:

KnightCavalier wrote:
Ok dude, testing female responsiveness with Julian Schalk's pics:

Views: 621

Likes: 217

what's the main difference between lovoo and tinder?

what means views and likes ? which one is like tinder matches?

Master Yoda wrote:

wannabe wrote:
Note: the experiment has been done in Germany which is not known for beautiful slim hotties, so i guess the best quality you can find there is the one shown in those pictures.
If he tried Poland or Sweden for example i guess it would get better.

I have tried an experiment like this with a MM with a face slightly less cute than that, slightly shorter height and about the same muscle mass/bf... he got matches and responses from better girls just because i tried other countries not germany nor uk.

The Chads shown in this thread would absolutely slay hotties anywhere in the world, and even here in Sydney, Australia (the toughest city in the world to meet women), these guys would be banging 10/10 supermodels every day.

3D Face Analysis wrote:just another reminder that online dating is a complete scam for 80% of males

Blackpiller2 wrote:Its because hes fucking white. White is EVERYTHING!!! I know guys who look this good are Asian, good jaw face, height, abs everything, but they couldn't pull this off. White is right. Sorry bros but these girls are RACIST to the core. It's a world of racism, to the core. If you're not white, they will simply swipe left lol... weed you out. Fucked up.

New2Aesthetics wrote:getting matches are easy, but there are other factors your experiment hasn't considered:

- How many of the matches respond to a simply ''Hi'', ''wanna meet'', ''Wanna fuck'', etc.?
- How many of the matches are willing to meet for a one night stand? (the true test)
- How many of the matches are interested to meet at all (cofee/get to know, dating/ltr relationship)?


I made experiments with male model guys as well (Lachowski, and blonde blue eyed instagram male model Brian Lastname). the actual number of ACTIVE matches were far smaller and less impressive than the total amount of matches.