And a female wrote a lengthy reply to his questions:
But just to be clear, the same result [dumping him] will happen with any guy…it’s not just betas who will eventually be dumped. With an alpha…well let’s be honest, these don’t exist over the long term, they all turn into needy alphas or betas eventually.
And with a needy alpha, I may be afraid of him and therefore will refrain from cheating or breaking up solely out of fear, but otherwise I will do so as quickly as I can figure out a safe way to do so. Alphas = as I said before, there is no such thing as an Alpha over the long-term in my experience – every man eventually turns into a beta or a Needy Alpha.
I would *love* to just date for six months or a year. But what you’re forgetting is that MEN WILL NOT TOLERATE THIS. I have never, in my life, met a single guy who I can have sex with who will not insist on monogamy and locking me down. I have literally gone out of my way to seek out scumbags and it still doesn’t matter. Therefore, this idea of just dating/fucking is a fantasy. If I tried to do that I would have no dates because I have literally had men withhold sex from me and tell me that they refuse to have sex with me anymore until they can get a commitment from me.
My “plan,” if I had my way, would be to live for the rest of my life with my platonic best friends and have them be my source of companionship and family, while fucking new guys every few months. However, society won’t let me do this (though I think in the future it will be the preferred way of living).
When you meet a new guy you’re attracted to, you get wet just thinking about him. After a while it takes making out to get you wet. A little while longer and *nothing* will get you wet except for direct stimulation of your vagina while you think about something else that turns you on. And then a little while after that and you will start to feel actively repulsed when he touches you or tries to kiss you and it will take a very strong force of will to not slap his hands away or snap at him out of visceral revulsion. After you have been with the same guy for a while and a new guy touches you, your physical reaction will be so volcanic that there is literally nothing to stop it.
But in the same way that a harem/polygamy is the ultimate expression of man’s unrestrained sexuality, serial monogamy that doesn’t last longer than a few months (maybe a couple years if they have a baby but that is it TOPS) is what all women would do if they were unrestrained. And lots of hot women are so dumb that they allow themselves to be fooled by religious/social conditioning so that even while they naturally enact what I’ve described above, they will never actually be AWARE of it, and they’ll make up all kinds of rationalizations. All women would if they could, usually only sexy/smart women will.
http://www.blackdragonblog.com/2014/01/ ... ent-151943
I think there are some truths to that. There is no "alpha" in the long run. No matter how coldhearted a PuA tries to be, he can't keep up with the slutiness of females. Now matter how much he tries to play "dread game", a female will simply slut on. Even Roosh and the RoK staff have basically given up on PuA and are alt-right people now who consider moving to Russia because they hope to find faithful women there - while women their age simply go on with being sluts.
Even the most ruthless casanova will eventually turn into a beta who tries to lock down a girl - while she just wants to slut on. Besides, most PuAs aren't really that ruthless - they just think that pretending to be ruthless will make a woman commit to you and lock her down. It's a paradox. That's like with, say, religion. Sometimes you read articles about how people who are very religious tend to suffer from depressions less often. But if you are not religious and don't actually believe in God or something, but just try to use religion as some sort of psychotherapist "trick" then (because you only believe in faith but not in God) it won't work, of course.