Ashley Madison had 20 million men and only 1 thousand women

Share your experiences with the opposite sex. Suggest ways to improve your success. Analyze the behavior of females in real life and online. Rant and rave about females. Show the importance of looks pertaining to attracting females and other social situations. Discuss aesthetics and the science of attractiveness. Exchange health, nutrition and looksmaxing tips.



Anal prolapse wrote:
Master Yoda wrote:
I'd say ALL dating/or sex sites need to be regulated, paid or free, not that there many true free dating sites around.

You have made a good point about dormant profiles that should be removed by the dating sites, but I have to respectfully disagree with you regarding the issue of fake profiles. As it has now been revealed, the creation of fake profiles is one of the main reasons the internet dating industry has such a bad name, and the recent Ashley Madison hack is further evidence of this, in addition to the BBC documentary. Also, in addition to fake profiles created by the site owners to suck in unsuspecting men, you have the issue of webcam whores, Nigerian scammers etc, who use online dating sites to target their chosen victims.

Not that I can see this happening anytime soon, or at all, but this is my proposal on how the on line dating industry needs to be regulated, as history has clearly shown the industry cannot be trusted to self regulate itself.

1) The particular online dating site, must set up an office (and they have the money to do this), where any new member must present themselves in person and positively identify themselves with a photo drivers license, passport, birth certificate etc, no positive ID, you DON'T get signed up. This measure would eliminate the webcam girls, Nigerian scammers, attention whores etc, plus this would eliminate the tactic where someone posts an out of date photo that was taken 15 years and 15kg ago. ie. the photo would be a current one.

2) The online dating site must be honest about the true gender ratios of their respective sites, for example if their site has say 200,000 members, then it must give an accurate as possible break up eg.110,000 men, 90,000 women. If most unsuspecting men realised what a total sausage/cock fest all on line dating/sex sites are, no man in his right mind would sign up (unless he is a good looking Chad/slayer).

In saying this, I am not suggesting that in any shape or form that the said online dating/sex site must guarantee every member a partner/s, absolutely not, because at the end of the day it's both the man and the woman's decision if they are attracted to one another, and whether they wish to engage in any kind of romantic/sexual relationship. However, an online dating/or sex site should ensure that all profiles are real people who are genuinely using the respective dating/sex site for the purpose it was intended for.


LOLOLOL, no, the industry SHOULD NOT be regulated.

Faggots got scammed, I'm laughing at the motherfuckers.

Fuck them.

Stupid assholes who thought they will cheat on others with others cheating on others.

They deserve to have their money stolen.


I can appreciate what you are trying to say, but I was referring to the more mainstream dating sites, not the cheating ones like Ashley Madison.
This is what happens whenever I approach women.
Image
Image

Image
ucp.php?i=172
Image

Image

Image

Life long member of the escort crew

Arabcel crew

Ethnicel crew

Baldcel crew

Oldcel crew

Gymcel crew

Ted Mosby wrote:My observations :

* Men are miserable in marriages
*Women use 'bait and switch' tatic to get men to marry them.
*Women use sex as a loss leader.
*Women are better and masters at cheating, they hide it's very well.

+1
Good call, as a life long member of the escort crew, many of the hookers I see all tell me that the vast majority of their regular clientele are married men, not ugly hard core incels like me. Last Wednesday I saw a mature age hooker who I have been a regular of for the last 7 years, and in her estimation 70% of her clients are married men who are miserable in their marriages where the sex life has died in the arse. She told me about a 30 year old married guy (with 3 kids) who visits a brothel 3 times a week (how does he afford it?), and he complains that he is miserable and he gets no sex from his wife.

A close friend of mine, who has been married for nearly 16 years, is now visiting hookers because the sex life between him and his wife has dried up.

So basically, married men who are not happy in their marriages have two choices (unless they want to get a divorce), and they are:

1) Have an affair, and hope they don't get caught.
2) Bang hookers.

I'd say option 2 is the safer one, because as long as the married guy pays the hooker in cash, he won't get caught, as visiting a hooker is like going to confession ie. "what happens in the room, stays in the room".

Is that actually legit? I'm pretty sure there are plenty of women that want to cheat, it feels like some feminist made this up so she can pin only men as the cheaters. :?:
If you can't have sex with a woman out of acknowledgement and respect, then It's just better to die a virgin.



Misantrov wrote:Is that actually legit? I'm pretty sure there are plenty of women that want to cheat, it feels like some feminist made this up so she can pin only men as the cheaters. :?:

The difference is they can cheat whenever they feel like with whomever they feel like. They don't need any shady site for that.

They can just choose men from their social circle, talk to a handsome guy they run into, go out for drinks with girlfriends, or even open a "harmless" Tinder account.

They don't need to have a special site for cheaters which they can only browse in private and delete browsing history after each login.

It's only for 80% of the men who are kept in the dark about is really going on in the sex market.

LOLOLOL

At least we can cope now by saying that a woman online only rejected us because she was a bot or fake. Feed dat cope.
Image



just lol @ all those sub males talking to bots and fakes hopeing for sex

dont forget they paid for this

men making profiles in ashley madison :they are all retards
there is always a scams for retards women or men
scammers use different bait
men generally are scammed with hope for sex, women are scammed with astrology/divination or hope to marry a prince or provider

I have a feeling that this I a lie. 1000 to 2M is jus too much. I think that women were just smart enough to not use trackable information

Oh and in tinde 99% are real so don't confuse this with women not using online dating ever
Race: curry
Dick: 5.3x5.1
Skin: color of shit
Height: 5'5
Picture: you get the picture
PostThis post by cats was deleted by puanewb on Thu Mar 10, 2016 11:26 am.
Reason: Requested via PM

cats wrote:
Currycel wrote:I have a feeling that this I a lie. 1000 to 2M is jus too much. I think that women were just smart enough to not use trackable information

It's based on the number of women who ever checked their messages. You can't fake the data, it's all very real.

Only about 1 thousand women checked their messages EVER in the history of Ashley Madison. While 20 million men checked their messages.

Currycel wrote:Oh and in tinde 99% are real so don't confuse this with women not using online dating ever

How do you know 99% are real? They could easily have just as many fakes as Ashley Madison.


Oh ok then that makes sense. And I know tinder is real because I've trolled it a lot and haven't found one fake yet. I know for a fact that most are real. Specially because most have their Instagram up

I have a question. Does anyone know how the situation is in gold digger sites like seeking arrangements? Are most users still men (poor men), or are most women? Are most female accounts real there?
Image
PostThis post by cats was deleted by puanewb on Thu Mar 10, 2016 11:26 am.
Reason: Requested via PM

There are tons of free sites with plenty of real women to fuck

Some that come to mind:

-POF
-Okcupid
-Zoosk
-Tinder
-Hotornot
-Meetme
-Collarspace

You can go on all those sites for free and you can message 100 girls in 10-15 minutes if you copy and paste.Easy pickings if you have good pics+profile.
Image

RageAndFury wrote:There are tons of free sites with plenty of real women to fuck

Some that come to mind:

-POF
-Okcupid
-Zoosk
-Tinder
-Hotornot
-Meetme
-Collarspace

You can go on all those sites for free and you can message 100 girls in 10-15 minutes if you copy and paste.Easy pickings if you have good pics+profile.


As a man, you'd want to be very, very good looking to have any chance at succeeding on a online dating site, otherwise you are wasting your time.

cats wrote:
MoneyOverBitches wrote:I have a question. Does anyone know how the situation is in gold digger sites like seeking arrangements? Are most users still men (poor men), or are most women? Are most female accounts real there?

Probably 99% fake females. Any site where only the men pay is a scam.


I'd say all dating sites (either paid or free) are scams, remember the online dating industry it not regulated, therefore it can, and does get away with murder.

^Are you retarded or did you miss the title that said 20 million men and only 1 thousand women? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Rotting Penis wrote:^Are you retarded or did you miss the title that said 20 million men and only 1 thousand women? :lol: :lol: :lol:


yes 20 000 000 vs 1000 , I believe in that
and the 1000 real women I'm sure all are unfuckeable obese landwhales married to some obese male hog or some unnatractive bald cel

I kind of wish that AM was never leaked and this crazy ratio was never uncovered just so all of these fools can continue circle jerking. It still amazes me how many guys haven't realized the gender ratio in general is so heavily skewed in online dating but with a ratio like AM I am just amazed people pay for that shit
Previous

Topic Tags

Return to Shitty Advice

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fabie, Google [Bot] and 94 guests