Women advocate for darwiniality. They're schemers. They're more determiend than even men to get laid. So when they reject you, and ignore you, the fail on your part is even more abysmal. Greater depth on why a girl rejects you than a guy. Women are almost entirely predicated on sex. It's written in their genocode for survival. Men can be more sloven and laidback than women. But women are extremely hasten and drawn to procreational subjects.
They're Ambitious latent domination desireres with veneers of being virtuous/ filled with jubilance/ gentleness. Human beings are prideful creatures; you can't really expect them to not be machiavellian.
Women are well aware of darwiniality. And they love it; When they're on top of it. They judge you more on your unmalleable traits than anything immaterial/ changeable like muscles/ behavior. Having face is 30x more valuable than money or status. But money is valuable nonetheless because of the status it encompasses.
Why? Well there's only one explanation. They want primal superiority from the benefits of the biostructure of the anatomarchy (anatomy hierarchy). Why? Well that's the distincter of ancient/ darwinial/ existentiarchical/ evolutionary true value. Value that cannot be disputed irrespective of cirucmstance/ class/ changeable aspects. They want people who reek of the bad ass primal presence. THey don't want to have anyone who seems like they oculdn't live on the edge in any way, or seem that way. They want people who could live in 10,000 B.C. where it was primal/ darwinial/ competitive/ every flaw exploited.
They pick these people ebcause they want to have the highest primal tyranny momentum in the people around them. And that's what makes htem happy. Our gratifications are so predicated around inequality that it's ultimately sad.
Mental illnesses are not the worst thing that drives the psyche around mankind. It's just the generally manufactured structure that mankind has. Manufacturizations come in patterns with nature. The bio structure of species of plants/ animals apply to uniformity of humanity as well. Which is while the term "generalization" has a negative colloquial connotation. But, sometimes you're just saying something that's generally true. It's like saying "you're moisturizing" when you're pointing at a wet weed. When in reality it is not moisturizing. I am not distorting the nature of it with my description. It is what it is.
Same goes for when I "generalize" saying that mankind is primal, and cares more about these unmalleable dominarchical aspects... because they have the primal utility of showing evolutionary regality through your lineage/ family/ etc.
The things people want are being high up on the primal radar that we are programmed with. And the real markers of primarchical affluence are determined by your unmalleable traits. Because unmalleable traits send the most imposing messages of you being natural/ existentially/ universally born dominators. Who dont' require the aid of society/ infrastructure to conceal your failo effect/ insulate you from your weaknesses.
Women are on the hunt for men liek this to create the primal momentum of unmalleable/ natural born winner value to dominate other people. Women have these shadow agendas. And they intend to fulfill with them.
“I could show fight on natural selection having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit. Remember what risk the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is! The more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.”
― Charles Darwin
"A prevention of the faculty and opportunity to procreate on the part of the physically degenerate and mentally sick, over the period of only six hundred years, would not only free humanity from an immeasurable misfortune, but would lead to a recovery which today seems scarcely conceivable."
― Adolf Hitler
"The way of nature has always been to slay the hindmost, and there is still no other way, unless we can prevent those who would become the hindmost being born. It is in the sterilization of failures, and not in the selection of successes for breeding, that the possibility of an improvement of the human stock lies."
― H. G. Wells
"It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind....Three generations of imbeciles are enough."
― U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Buck v. Bell, 1927