Girls even if they're high partisan for a relationship can't deal with much pressure, so any non-ideal stimulus will get them to leave. Even if they're up for Chad. Of course, there are many exceptions. They will probably fight, but again it's harder for women to hold out than it is for men.
They will Monkey branch off If they have the sexual market capital to bounce off to something/ someone else comfortable, or if they're in danger (like if they're with an alabama husband or a muslim man), or if they're desperate and stay in the relationship ebcause they would rather be with mediocrity than without.
Remember there are bond/ relationship desirers/ needers. Then there are profiteers/ value suckers/ placeholder reciprocationists. Or people simply under threat.
It's usually the purpose who has to sustain the relationship for the sake of making the other stay who are leveraged by the whims/ will of the other. Women are like that, and they enjoy being in that position. And women are far less willing to deal with the same turbulence that they put the other who is in the pursuer position do. They don't care if it's unfair for that person. Biologically because they are less equipped to deal with pressure, and because they feel entitled to deal with less, and put it all on men because of gender differences (feminist ideology).
Even though girls are highly anxious, they're quicker than men to leave because they are given honeycomb handotus in our highly privileged humanitarian society. Makes them feel unobligated and entitled to an easy gravy train life because they're innately disadvatnaged. People think we live in an insulated civilized bubble where all of the beastly crude aspects of the universe shoudl be put down. And for many it is, but wome nfeel that htey not more accommodations for it to be the case for them. It's not a happily ever after for them, because the universe is always pitted against them for being weaker, and gender battlelining. So they have to fight.
Male attraction is easier for women than a woman's is for a man. Woman look at more aspects than men than just bodily aspects. But women are 80% generally appealing to men can get with a guy imemdiately. Whereas 20% of men are appealing to women off the bat. So the selection pool of a woman is divied over a wide selection pool. Only the best out of all her pool can get with her/ relationshipize. Since there are more peopel ocming for her. A guy gets less women on him... if they're even chasing, and if none are coming, or just none ideal then he has to chase the one he finds ideal. (a guy who feels less deserving will think any girl who comes for him is a prize). This is why you find a lot of men chasing after women. Because women feel like they're never desperate for a guy. She has a lot of guys. A lot of ideals guys too. If the guy creates any complications, then she'll find no harm in finding another host who is nigh fulfilling.
Because women that men find ideal don't chase, but they find a lot of chasers anyway. Women will get with the perfect balance of value/ provision/ loyalty/ etc. That's why you find more men following women, because people that women find chaseworthy are rare. It's uisually the woman who has higher leverage in the relationship in today's society.
Essentially women will have an easier time getting laid than men.
-humanitarian hierarchical society giving them handouts/ honeycombs/ handouts.
-underlying axiom/ ideal that women need more than men for equity. The dimorphic differences make them more suited to things in of itself to get what they need. (but this pervading long enough makes them get blow after blow privilege, to the point where htep rivilege they get is over that which closes the gap of a man's dimorphic advantage to a woman).
-women can't deal with the same pressure, and are more impulsive/ emotional/ fickle and finical. They will leave a guy if he slips/ shows weakness. And the female will go to the next guy for any marginal value increase. It's hypergamy. They can't deal with the social pressure of the inner criticism platform pillared after societal standards/ the outside world. They think about waht other people will think, especially if they thought of it first. They can't afford that. They will give in to the primal urge to rank up. For men it's less hypergamy and more libido. But this makes men have several fetishes and are polygamous. This will essentially make them more lenient to fuck a girl, and to not rank up. I.E. a man can impregnate 10 women. But a woman can only have 1 child. A woman will be more finical in finding the one who will have it. While for a man it's not THAT exclusive. So they are less finical.
-Women are more narcissistic. And enjoy entrapping men in their plight to get closer to them. And this will make them more amenable to cheating/ laying traps/ leveraging men to be undone by society, and be ostracized. Because society is under the unfortunate trap of being optimistic in the 21st century. Allowing women to have cunning. Which will make them able to have the shadow regions remaining by complacency.
-They love being on top in the relaitonship. And feel it's their time to have that glory. They will be more finical/ fickle/ ADD/ Fixed to try to have fun 247 (so that they can put pressure to milk the guy of what he has)/ etc. eveyrhting so that the guy/ chad will be more pressured and plighted to keep the relationship going. Where the bond will be taxing and conditional. Women, if they don't get what htey want, have PSES (Primally Structured Engagement System). Where they will only engage if the guy has high LMS, substance, power, value, servitude. And, althoug htey will want to be dominated, they will use the chad as a puppet. The only reason the Chad will eb dominant is because of primal momentum. But even that fades quickly. Physical dominarchicality is nothing compared to interrelational dominarchicality in our humanitarian headway environment. And women will use that, and keep the need of regulating the situation to fall upon the chad. By acting dissatisfied/ fickle/ finical/ in need of more/ etc. And we, and all men know that if we put the need to regulate our disfavor upon the women... for her to balance out the tension of the relationship to settle our psyche/ to satisfy us... then the women will know the guy is not a good provider, and even if he is dominant he will not be a good puppet to the girl, not around her finger. And so she will skip off to the next chad who will be privy to always provide her the stability in the relationship no matter how nonchalanet/ cuntish/ difficult she wants to be to express herself freely. The moment a guy tries to fight back, and reuglate it for his dissatisfactions/ misgivings in the relationship, then it's likely she's going to quite and bail on you. Guys know this, and hence most guys try to be the best provider. Chad will draw with primal momentum but ultimately he's going to have to take his dick out, show his value, and regulate it to the women.
-This isn't like the only days where women, when they monkey branch can't be stoned/ criminally faulted for being promiscuous. Except in the Islamic world usually. This is the tinder/ fb/ social media/ etc. age where women have access to a high selectivity pool. Even if 1% meet her criteria of chad/ primal perfection that's still a handful/ ton of people. And she will swing over if her expectations of perfection are not met generally. Primal momentum/ substance means more to them than bond. And they can't take pressure in any sort, even those who are interactive with pure bond, independent from being too finical about substance.
“I could show fight on natural selection having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit. Remember what risk the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is! The more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.”
― Charles Darwin
"A prevention of the faculty and opportunity to procreate on the part of the physically degenerate and mentally sick, over the period of only six hundred years, would not only free humanity from an immeasurable misfortune, but would lead to a recovery which today seems scarcely conceivable."
― Adolf Hitler
"The way of nature has always been to slay the hindmost, and there is still no other way, unless we can prevent those who would become the hindmost being born. It is in the sterilization of failures, and not in the selection of successes for breeding, that the possibility of an improvement of the human stock lies."
― H. G. Wells
"It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind....Three generations of imbeciles are enough."
― U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Buck v. Bell, 1927