There's always someone more insecure, more needy, more emotionally tethered to the relationship than the other who is probably higher value/ more social grid savvy/ more able to do without the other. And the latter holds leverage over the former.
The former/ insecure relationship highpartisan/ altipartisan pursuer vs. The relationship semipartisan/ hypopartisan.
Typically the highpartisan is someone of high status, or is just someone who might feel uncommitted as much as the other person. Because the other person might be not good looking, valuable, or too abusive, etc. Typically though you can be a higher partisan without loving the other if it's based on fear. Like a muslim girl/ southern girl with an abusive alabama husband. That's an example of a highpartisan relationship stability pursuer filled with un-desire.
These people are all in relationships
Desireful for relationshipship highpartisan relationship stability pursuer - Beta cuck
Undesireful for relationshipship highpartisan relationship stability pursuer - Alabama Abused Wife
Desireful for relationship semipartisan - seems contradictory but this happens. Imagine a person is a fat lazy potato but wants to be in a good relationship, but lacks the motivation.
Undesireful for relationshipship semipartisan - Woman getting tired of husband and wants to leave/ a woman with high sexual market value leaving beta for chad.
It is a female's wish to be the higher value pursued semipartisan, and everyone wants to be highpartisan. The seeker of value/ the one who treats the relationship like treasure. And the abundant/ surplus person who treats the relationship nonchalantly, and isn't tethered with emotion. Who is only invested via primal benefit. A girl wants to be seen of value from the REAL dynamics of life (ones she isn't commonly aware of). Primality/ Natural selection/ Darwiniality/ etc. Women are brutal realists underlyingly. They just put their minds in places of happy clappy fairy braiding. But they put all of the aspects of securing their own relationship with dominarchical capital in the back of their brain. They feel that anyone who is worthy of the darwiniality should be able to have it taken care of naturally. Without working towards it.
The more partisan you are than your mate, the more the relationship effects you usually. If that is, you have a desirement towards keeping the relationship with that person for the sake of having what they are attributed to yourself. And harvesting their genetics. It's typically the person who has the relationship being secure/ existent as a far more vital thing to their self wellness who is more leveraged by the acts of the other. And women want to have this kind of leverage over men. As do men over women. But women are genodesigned to search for this satanically seductive flare.
They want the interrelational leverage. One that uses the partisanship of the guy, along with the vitality of hte relationship to his personal health to leverage him in the woman looming the consequence of her being disfavored, and leaning to use her high primality hierarchy to go around the socialgrid to a better mate (her hypergamy) to force the guy to do better. That's why men follow women and not vice versa these days. Women have more leverage on the social grids because raw female aesthetics apply to more men than men do to women. Women are finical/ low patience/ high sensitivity and don't just put themselves out there in complete security. Also men are more superficial than women.. Looks are everything to us. But women look for other aspects. But still, our sole focus on looks gives women the advantage in attraction.
“I could show fight on natural selection having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit. Remember what risk the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is! The more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.”
― Charles Darwin
"A prevention of the faculty and opportunity to procreate on the part of the physically degenerate and mentally sick, over the period of only six hundred years, would not only free humanity from an immeasurable misfortune, but would lead to a recovery which today seems scarcely conceivable."
― Adolf Hitler
"The way of nature has always been to slay the hindmost, and there is still no other way, unless we can prevent those who would become the hindmost being born. It is in the sterilization of failures, and not in the selection of successes for breeding, that the possibility of an improvement of the human stock lies."
― H. G. Wells
"It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind....Three generations of imbeciles are enough."
― U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Buck v. Bell, 1927