You need the ability to have external substance prominence and power to generate the feeling they like to have to secure their satisfaction/ intimacy span to your favor and sexual taste. And the snootier/ spoiled/ surplused the girl is the likely that satisfaction span has more stipulations and a smaller half life.
Plenty of men have inner game/ confidence. But it's not really that special to women. No, it's the exclusive/ vastly unattainable things they want. Things Effort Strides/ Most Initiated Actions can't help, things that are changeable/ producable to attain can't really affect. Things which speak of a person's existence as an upperworlder/ a Patricianarch. And that is, someone who has had life as a firmly established individual with the natural/ intrinsic/ instinctual aptitudes that makes him a chosen one from the arrangements of the barbaric chaos of nature. Whose genes are from the gods/ from the competitive battlefield of selection/ domination/ resource scarcity/etc. Female desire is predicated/ refined/ directly connected to cynical darwinial viewpoints that are utterly subconscious.
Women are like the Ancient greeks who thought that aesthetics/ one's ability to have the pheromonic impression from their physical form are what tell of a person's intrinsic/ instictual/ natural aptitudes. Women feel that men's value is shown through how well valued he is through the more base/ primal/ philistine/ neanderthalistic society/ people/ her viewpoint can bridge to and STILL have novelty and understanding. That if mankind narrows the scope of scrutiny to only ONLY what is animalistically essential/ valued, with a high impulse/ highly critical/ high aggressive reflex, and if he is still valuable/ read as impressive even then, then he is acceptable, and intimacy worthy.
They want the value of a person defined/ attained by more nonviable and thus harder to meet mediums that are what women like. because it gives off a higher predatarchical/ primarchical/ dominarchical resonance to have the vibe/ mental impression coupled with someone who has the essential aspects of what makes people higher beings/ patricianship, which is essentially having a long established success/ winning streak with mankind that they are the type which makes the hard/ refined/ successful/ imposing/ impressionable of evolutionary expertship/ the vibe of a person who is of the superior class of mankind through instinctive aptitudes/ well built genes and superiority in their body. All of the things which constitute individuality superiority which women crave for themselves.
They love/ marvel at the notion of them being envied/ loved/ seen with patricianarchical capital/ predatarchical capital. The vibe of the upperworldly oppressor spreading obscurity for the masses and keeping the impression of higher existence upon them. Creating passive presence that people can only fear, marvel, yield, admire at. A person who puts people in a despotic darwinian demagoguery. Women want genetic/ evolutionary/ impressionary patricianship. Patricigamy is the real form of hypergamy. The evolutionary patriciate of existence.
Women wanna be a bitch. It's interwoven in how they act unless they have desperation. Take the desperation out of anything and they'll always be cuntish. Based on the way they judge themselves/ others and see certain abstract elements of commerce, like LMS, prominence, prowess, prominence, glamor, competence achievement as being the most essential things of value to all mankind. And not only that, but they pillar your worthiness as a human being almost completely on this. Morality, integrity, love are almost utterly peripheral.
Being a thrill riding predatarch of power and domination is what their primal of positive/ negative attention scale is pitched on. And their hormonal waywardness is pendulumed in the positive only by how well you can add something new/ exciting/ stimulating and interesting. And that's utterly dependent on her rate of satisfaction span before she tries to find something else. A nearly unmappable system of neural circuitry because of the freedom/ capriciousness of the girl in the first world.
They get their hots off it. The whole point of being a man is supposed to be a stepping stone for her personal status supply whereby they can step on others. And keep that momentum going. Women expect us to feel sorry for them when they pillar their happiness on things of competitive vanity, and choose to base their emotions/ self worth on relational scales. They wouldn't have darwinial scales by which they judge themselves if they didn't predicate their self worth on the commerce of power, prominence, prowess, LMS, etc. Essentially help to them implies giving them something tyrannical.
Mankind is preservational in being selfish. We can be far more communal and loving but look how self focused/ seeking they are. It's all because they're trying to dominate and imply their superiority whereby they validate their existence to their own platform of selfishness/ cuntishness/ dominarchicality.
We're evolutionarily designed to enjoy stepping on others or making them step aside. Being confident and moding your mind after women wanting to have fun without the spur to primalify their power/ lives over others is naive and stupid.
And having the idea that women will bond with you truly without any predatarchical capital, social predatorship or raw untamed savannah world predatorship is just making you a cuck normie.
“I could show fight on natural selection having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit. Remember what risk the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is! The more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.”
― Charles Darwin
"A prevention of the faculty and opportunity to procreate on the part of the physically degenerate and mentally sick, over the period of only six hundred years, would not only free humanity from an immeasurable misfortune, but would lead to a recovery which today seems scarcely conceivable."
― Adolf Hitler
"The way of nature has always been to slay the hindmost, and there is still no other way, unless we can prevent those who would become the hindmost being born. It is in the sterilization of failures, and not in the selection of successes for breeding, that the possibility of an improvement of the human stock lies."
― H. G. Wells
"It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind....Three generations of imbeciles are enough."
― U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Buck v. Bell, 1927