Nothing makes people more sociopathic than loneliness.

Bash the pick-up art community. Challenge the assumptions and techniques used by pick-up art, discredit the effectiveness of pick-up art, expose ripoff products, and reveal secret info of dating gurus.

I am pretty sure the entire reason that people become numb to feeling anything for others is because people are commonly on the emotional state of being selective/ hierarchical/ non-responsive unless you meet their criteria of high value... or their association span shuts down completely. Greed is the reason for this. The less people cherish people around them, and want just love/ communality/ company... and instead have the high-rolling primal dominancy... which is VERY COMMON... then people forget love, brotherhood, communion and just prioritize to adapt to the darkness of the world instead. But love/ compassion/ consideration form this view is cheap and less than the communion you get when you're around a generally shared love.

It's hard to be a beacon for love and goodness like Jesus or Ghandi when everyone around you is giving opposite resonances. Can't really blame people for doing what's rational and forgetting about others. We're a vile species before we are beautiful. TV/ fiction/ fantasy gives off different views, but that's just reality tone warping propaganda.
Image

Image

“I could show fight on natural selection having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit. Remember what risk the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is! The more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.”
― Charles Darwin

"A prevention of the faculty and opportunity to procreate on the part of the physically degenerate and mentally sick, over the period of only six hundred years, would not only free humanity from an immeasurable misfortune, but would lead to a recovery which today seems scarcely conceivable."
― Adolf Hitler

"The way of nature has always been to slay the hindmost, and there is still no other way, unless we can prevent those who would become the hindmost being born. It is in the sterilization of failures, and not in the selection of successes for breeding, that the possibility of an improvement of the human stock lies."
― H. G. Wells

"It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind....Three generations of imbeciles are enough."
― U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Buck v. Bell, 1927



There's also an evolutionary reason. We evolved from tribal groups numbering around 100 individuals and so that is the optimal number we can deal with. Desmond Morris in his book touched lightly on it, noting that if you took any city dweller, and went through the people he knew who he can socialise with, it would be near this number.

I suppose what we can infer from this is that people are not egalitarian at all. If everyone valued everyone else the same there would be no need for this selectivity. When people talk about love, brotherhood, communion that's only so far as it serves their self interests. We only have limited mental capacity to deal with so many people, so rather than thinly spread our attentions all over the place, we focus on those who would be worth our time and resources to engage in, and I'm almost certain it's down to primality factors. But there are also other games people play: the girl who already has a boyfriend but has loads of orbiters as her friends so she can status signal her desirability, men who forms friendships with females to keep their girlfriends on their toes, and the liberal retards who need the odd ethnic here and there to show everyone how progressive they are. . . but at the root of it all is human selfishness and needing to project some sense of self worth to others whilst at the same time barring those not desirable.

my parents are ugly losers and try consoling me about my subhumanity by telling me they love me

but it doesnt maje me feel better at all, is this because i know theyre low on the "primarchy"?

a hot girl saying she finds me hot would make me feel 10x better than that



There's also an evolutionary reason. We evolved from tribal groups numbering around 100 individuals and so that is the optimal number we can deal with. Desmond Morris in his book touched lightly on it, noting that if you took any city dweller, and went through the people he knew who he can socialise with, it would be near this number.
Often in tribal groups there was elitism. An us vs. them mentality. Essentially who you choose ot let in, and who you don't has a layer of supremacy/ violence/ distaste when you fall towards the lesser pillar. Of course there's love and kinship with a tribe. But who falls out of that usually gets met with darkness. Just look around you to see the truth, and how this thesis/ semantical slant outweighs all other forms of clarification. Look at all other forms of clarification and see how much of a wishful whimsical twist it is.

I suppose what we can infer from this is that people are not egalitarian at all. If everyone valued everyone else the same there would be no need for this selectivity.
YAS. :evil: :evil: :twisted:

When people talk about love, brotherhood, communion that's only so far as it serves their self interests. We only have limited mental capacity to deal with so many people, so rather than thinly spread our attentions all over the place, we focus on those who would be worth our time and resources to engage in, and I'm almost certain it's down to primality factors.
I had a dream last night that a cat was dying on the street, and told me it wanted to die, at least that's what the fleas on its body should think it should do. I felt like helping it but then my hands would get dirty, it may be one of those fucked up dreams where it turns into a flurry of flies that devour me when I pick it up. I don't feel like letting my bath get dirty and going to the vet. I could have done it, but I listened to my voices of selfish preserverence. In managing the resources of comfort, security, happiness, etc. more than lending a hand out. Logistics/ Medianship/ Personal comfort/ these things are what keeps people from being noble.

Primality directive/ priority trumps almost everything. Edifice is such a rare occurence, and then even so, I'd say no one is purely edified.

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-ente ... 69859.html
Might be woman cries wolf but it still implies that what I say is true.

But there are also other games people play: the girl who already has a boyfriend but has loads of orbiters as her friends so she can status signal her desirability, men who forms friendships with females to keep their girlfriends on their toes, and the liberal retards who need the odd ethnic here and there to show everyone how progressive they are. . . but at the root of it all is human selfishness and needing to project some sense of self worth to others whilst at the same time barring those not desirable.
People play the primality probing game with people, and then when they know about how much primality currency debt they have, and their method/ manner of removing it, then people begin to manipulate it. It's a donkey and a carrot, and often they get the donkey to do their dishes and pay their mortgage before it's all over. You have to be a comforting cushion, and a tightrope at the same time. Comforting so that they don't feel you are so detrimental that investing/ vying for your favor will lead to the detriment of something they feel is more essential than social status. And a tightrope so as to represent your place on the hierarchy/ medium of interest that people want to see for themselves -- Elevated as a primal prodigy. Often, and I know it sounds crazy, but women will put a man/ primal capital she seeks from him ahead of her own personal safety/ even when there's a gun on her pussy she'll still probably try. Which says a LOT about beta orbiters. About how ineffective their efforts are, and how primal/ tyrannoficial centric women are. (Tyranno ficial means tyrannical over the surface of the world/ putting no emphasis on what is immaterial).

But you also have to be the tightrope that represents that you still have an otherworldly obscurity to who you are, one that can't be controlled, one with the grandeur of an otherworldly entity that has the power/ impetus to get things they want and bring reality to their level. Who sets the temperature of the room/ atmosphere/ lets people know who they are in relation to you. And that people will perceive as indicative of an oppressor with the primal momentum in relation to the intellectual grasp/ gleaning and the way people dimension you on the darwinian/ competitive hierarchy. One that people can't find any foreseeable medium to be controlled/ abused/ taken advantage of. Where people are constantly under the impression of his primal shadow and only have the slimiest/ weaseliest weapons to use, but none of true martial honor or primal merit in a face to face darwinial arena. People want this MORE than their mates being a good person. This is the inner darwinality of mankind put before us. This is what most people would rather have than to have true communionality with people.

It's impossible to ever believe there was an era in whcih peopel really wanted true friendships. People want to expand their ego/ prominence passively in life. They can't just have everything be stilled into serenity and harmony. Greed is ever present and dispersed and will conduit to people trying to get ahead of one another, for narcissistic and darwinial superiority pleasure. This is what people truly want.

Like gaston in beauty and the beast. The real monster of that entire story is the town who elevates gaston to the level of power that he gets to. That movie is about the science of beauty and how that trait comes to esteem. While Bella was edified in finding beauty in the beast, the entire town was primified.

lonliness causes people to become dark omega trolls rather then the successful intelligent sociopaths, who become business men.

After years of rejection in highschool, college and tinder I have become more impulsive and low inhibition. I have made girls go places to meet "Chad" on tinder then ghost on them. I have cold approaches random foreign girls with a "job offer" to make them hang out with me, put garbage on tables where Chad and Stacy cit. Rejection based on looks will do one of 2 things to a human being:

1. You spiral deeper and deeper into depression, eventually commiting suicide. It's inevitable as the depression makes you less attractive and surgery most likely isn't enough to compensate for the lack of social skills created by rejection

2. You become more impulsive and do autistic/sociopathic behaviour.

1. Sexually aggressive cold approaching
2. Spilling coffee on Chad/Stacy couples
3. Weird catfish experiments
4. Committing minor crimes such as theft
5. Doing weird bizarre activities
6. AFTER ADVANCED REJECTION, school shootings, mass murder

Youtube examples includesurveillance camera man, Dan Cilley and other creepy PUA channels

facial asymmetry has it right. The more sexually frustrated a person is the more obsessed they become with their situation, and different people have different reactions to that obsession.
When due process fails us, we really do live in a world of terror.



lonliness causes people to become dark omega trolls rather then the successful intelligent sociopaths, who become business men.
Dark omega trolling can lead into sociopathic manipulative behavior. Sociopathality isn't just restricted to being a person who

You can become a sociopath who is emotionally surged and gain cognitive disregard for people. That can be habituated. Some people are sociopathic without emotional surges. But because they have brain defects.

I encourage people of the former sort. The latter limits your prefrontal cortex to certain full forms of analysis. Most sociopaths I've known have had shitty "cognitive" empathy. That's another civilization lie to garner more fear of sociopaths who are brought not from emotional surgement but from cerebral deformation from an internal locus. You need sociopathy and emotional empathy at your command. Be an emotional surgement sociopath by tapping into your hate/ insecurity... the passive forms of anger and hate. That's what a true Sith Sage would recommend.

I think your right. You should get a doctorate so you can become a legitimate doctor and then possibly professor it would be cool. People would take your dissertations more seriously I would imagine....

And IMO your right. The more time you spend alone the less you start to care about other people "when where they there for me" kind of attitude... My money on it is that its a personality disorder that can develop with time...

Brimstone wrote:I think your right. You should get a doctorate so you can become a legitimate doctor and then possibly professor it would be cool. People would take your dissertations more seriously I would imagine....

And IMO your right. The more time you spend alone the less you start to care about other people "when where they there for me" kind of attitude... My money on it is that its a personality disorder that can develop with time...
Chinese water torture can make you sociopathic. Work stress can make you sociopathic. But this is universal and innately tethered as a constant occurrence in our biology.

ER is just an obvious example of something far more widespread and dangerous than even psychopathy with our species. It's our system of esteem.

Eugenicist wrote:
Brimstone wrote:I think your right. You should get a doctorate so you can become a legitimate doctor and then possibly professor it would be cool. People would take your dissertations more seriously I would imagine....

And IMO your right. The more time you spend alone the less you start to care about other people "when where they there for me" kind of attitude... My money on it is that its a personality disorder that can develop with time...
Chinese water torture can make you sociopathic. Work stress can make you sociopathic. But this is universal and innately tethered as a constant occurrence in our biology.

ER is just an obvious example of something far more widespread and dangerous than even psychopathy with our species. It's our system of esteem.


You are so brilliant!!! haha, damn... Its obv. a wide spread issue.... its only going to get worse, it sucks that people don't see it.

Brimstone wrote:
Eugenicist wrote:Chinese water torture can make you sociopathic. Work stress can make you sociopathic. But this is universal and innately tethered as a constant occurrence in our biology.

ER is just an obvious example of something far more widespread and dangerous than even psychopathy with our species. It's our system of esteem.


You are so brilliant!!! haha, damn... Its obv. a wide spread issue.... its only going to get worse, it sucks that people don't see it.
Ppl do but don't put it into the eureka light like we do unfortunately. They don't come to the reality of women/ social selection to pile the data onto this line of rationale. Ppl actually know a lot but don't put it on the right structures of thought in their psyche. They lack the insight and introversion.

PussySlaughter wrote:


good taste m8. in flames is leyjit. nice mix of melody and heaviness

Ronald McDonald wrote:
good taste m8. in flames is leyjit. nice mix of melody and heaviness
prrrft
Last edited by Eugenicist on Tue Mar 20, 2018 8:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

Ronald McDonald wrote:
PussySlaughter wrote:


good taste m8. in flames is leyjit. nice mix of melody and heaviness
Wrong you fools. This is better.

Return to Bash the Scene

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 6 guests