Primality is the part of humanity that is innately drawn from instincts/ hormones/ baseness. Edificality (from Edification of mankind/ Englightenment) is the process of someone letting those things slide away. Super-ego, high moral
Though I suppose Edification is dependent on someone's compass by which they pillar their conduct of rightness/ morality. But let's just say from a sane perspective we attribute it with all of the good/ virtuous/ reasonable/ logical methods. But again, there are several variants of Edificality. And there is a definitive denotation of what is Primal. Women liking guys with big muscles, strong jaws, chads, with high status, high value, being the dominarchic obscure prodigy of the primality standardized subreality.
Human attraction is based in primality traits, as are all or most sentient creatures. Because we naturally lean towards those things for survival and grace in nature. LMS, power, prominence, prowess, competence, connections, achievement, etc. These things naturally appeal to our innate primality, as it is the priority within all mankind to derive our gratification on the inequality of others. Marxist/ Religious/ Virtuous people claim to profess themselves differently but it's all bullshit. People in vast amount of groups cannot be trained to have the willpower to be any less naturally inclined than what is possible without geno-changing intervention. Sluts gonna slut even if you put a burka on them. Hoes gonna hoe even if they say everyone is equal. People gonna hate even if they say they love all mankind and wish the best for them.
Edificality has several different formats. Humane Edificality is not mutually inclusive of being divine, even if people may abide by it. but Mechanical Edificality/ Deus Ex Machina still needs to have methods of discernment. Some hierarchies are irremovable, and are innately a part of any system of sentience.
I wouldn't say Edificality has any fixed distinct value to create an Edifarchy. Enlightenment/ Edification can go in many ways. But the primality of mankind is innately affixed in. Primality does have many variants. But for the sake of creating a cookie-cutter grid-spanning idea, it's better to leave primarchy vague amongst all of our underlying supposition of what we insinctually all KNOW about mankind.
Edificality is a process of going beyond the natural flows of nature. I'd say that certain phenomena having to do with an individual would come from an individually variegated primality system. Or a specially (of a species) variegated primality system. And there could be an edificality system. But ultimately there is a bit of primality within us all. You would have to go out of your way completely to hold back the storm of the primal tide to have Edificality/ Enlightenment and even then it seems unlikely.
EVEN if a girl has a completely Edifarchic selection system, and abstains away from Primality completely, she will still have a hierarchy. A girl can only bear one man's baby right? Essentially even if she isn't base, there is still a hierarchy to be had to hit all of her personal orientations for attraction. Sapiosexuality for a mechanical Edificality affected individual. And being a compassionate Christly Chivalric Character for someone who has Empathetic Edificality.
It's not like you incels want. Nearly no Women have unconditional Subserviality like ER craved. There isn't a pheromone in the sky that hormonally draws her to you. Like the trees give off that rick and morty potion No. 9. You need to fit the Edificality hierarchy, (if any girls like that exist), or the Primality hierarchy. Women indeed fit into more of the primality hierarchy from hormonal hungerings, no matter how Edified her inner essence seems to be, and her personal view/ variation of favored value is.
There's no escaping the selectivity module women, and all people hold. All women, no matter how primality inclined or Edificality effected will ever take an interest in anything common. It is a cumulative process in the human race to seek value that is rare, requires distinctivity and degrees of being on the refined hierarchy, and not on the rungs of that refinementarchy as a commonality. Sure, some girls may have INSANE Edificality to give pity to a sad persons' self esteem. But it may also be a part of the Edificality/ Moral Gradient of Justice/ virtuarchy for a person to not be given sex because the Edificalitist loves greatness in the universe, rather than the person himself. Even when someon has removed themselves from Primality, they still have their own Personally Variegated Moral Compass, so long as it keeps in with being outside of the Primal instinctual/ hormonal module. Again which is probably 0.0001% of the population. It's so uncommon especially with women who have their relationships take a greater toll on them than does the man.
“I could show fight on natural selection having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit. Remember what risk the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is! The more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.”
― Charles Darwin
"A prevention of the faculty and opportunity to procreate on the part of the physically degenerate and mentally sick, over the period of only six hundred years, would not only free humanity from an immeasurable misfortune, but would lead to a recovery which today seems scarcely conceivable."
― Adolf Hitler
"The way of nature has always been to slay the hindmost, and there is still no other way, unless we can prevent those who would become the hindmost being born. It is in the sterilization of failures, and not in the selection of successes for breeding, that the possibility of an improvement of the human stock lies."
― H. G. Wells
"It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind....Three generations of imbeciles are enough."
― U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Buck v. Bell, 1927