The concept of confidence is primarily predicated on the notion of having a positive nature/ a stubborn sense of self esteem, and to always see the best in every situation. Which gives off the boyscout/ sympathetic samaritan. That's the colloquial unvoiced semantical stance of the word confident... when I calculated all of the underlying insistences/ moving mobile passing context of the instance based on the cumulative manner in which it was implemented.
But this is a red herring, and not what girls really want. Sure, confidence can be gained from self belief, as confidence is not mutually inclusive of that semantical stance of the word where people are whimsidaisically self-reassuring and evasive of all instances of self-deprecation/ belittlement. Confidence really just means self belief, and people can get it from being arrogant. It's just that people want to insist on confidence in a way so as to fairydaisy people's thinking. To tip people off from primal capital, and to go straight into a different sort of capital... one of PURE bondship/ connectionship through PUAutist methods. Connection currency comes to most women from Primality currency gravity. PCG. Even if you're incompatible internally with a woman, but you have what she wants, then she will fake it to make it for you.
Women try to hypnotize people of their darkness. Of their schemes. Their common strategy for coding their intentions is like with confidence. Taking one aspect, and disproportioning it to create a false semantical psychstance to account for why X = X.
If X is truth, then Women want men to think Y = X, or Z = X or X = ? or ? = ? or for ? = X when women want to use the truth to confuse you. Getting a Woman to be objective or honest or convictious is like forcing a cat in a shower or for someone to instill conviction into women is like forcing a marble through a coin slot. Getting a bat to lounge around during dawnbreak. Or getting something out of a broken vending machine. No matter how much you put into it, you're not going to get something you expect back. Like trying to get a mosquito to pollinate a flower. You're not going to get the right result and it will bite back at you or get into a mess.
Women use Confidence as a semantical smokescreen/ masking semantic slipscape. It's a correlation with high value, but not the causation. They want to put misleading evidence that puts people in the underlying notion that woman's value system is pillared around things not of raw primality, but of a refined primality concerning people's inner essence/ inner conviction.
They do this because they want their agendas concealed, and so that no one will think twice of trying to produce value to fool/ manipulate a woman with veneers of primal value. Women want their discernment to be correct. Women want their discernment of value in certain areas where genes/ a person's inner demeanor/ etc. are in the manner/ fashion identitical to their ideal visualization/ reason/ favored fancy of what it stems from. Which is accidental/ unintentional/ undeliberate. To have primarchical eliteness from both the material raw (neanderthalistic) and material refined (Deftness) and immaterial attributes as a consequence of non-self conscious bearing/ for the identity to be brought about from an inadvertent inclination identity. (Which is something I find weak. If you're insecure it's better because you'll "DO THE MOST" as oppose for it to be someone's inadvertent inclination. Especially if it comes from weakness. Because insecurity makes you feel so much more pressured, and will force you under fear and hate to optimize yourself. On sheer substance, it's not just about your raw value, it's about your value in the moment, and utility. And someone obsessed with acquired value will exceed someone with inadvertent inclination because it's usually people with inadvertent inclination in nature to have flaws that only perfectionists can relinquish. People with the inadvertent inclination identity trail will always lose against a power obsessed tryhard).
They want the value produced, and for the general population to be as unpragmatic and unanalytical as possible. Women spread humanitarian hypnosis for this very same reason.
Confidence is a flamboyant pseudo-alpha behavior. It's very faggish. Girls know that and they love putting men in cucky thought loops, and laughing at their cuckpillable IQ. It's better to have a justified far-sighted arrogance. To have value that is truly worthy of the scales of esteem which warrants the notion that you CAN defeat obstacles/ competition in your way, and to have the right kind of raw and refined primal substance for that.
Last edited by Eugenicist on Sun Feb 18, 2018 5:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.
“I could show fight on natural selection having done and doing more for the progress of civilization than you seem inclined to admit. Remember what risk the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks, and how ridiculous such an idea now is! The more civilised so-called Caucasian races have beaten the Turkish hollow in the struggle for existence. Looking to the world at no very distant date, what an endless number of the lower races will have been eliminated by the higher civilized races throughout the world.”
― Charles Darwin
"A prevention of the faculty and opportunity to procreate on the part of the physically degenerate and mentally sick, over the period of only six hundred years, would not only free humanity from an immeasurable misfortune, but would lead to a recovery which today seems scarcely conceivable."
― Adolf Hitler
"The way of nature has always been to slay the hindmost, and there is still no other way, unless we can prevent those who would become the hindmost being born. It is in the sterilization of failures, and not in the selection of successes for breeding, that the possibility of an improvement of the human stock lies."
― H. G. Wells
"It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind....Three generations of imbeciles are enough."
― U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Buck v. Bell, 1927